What goes on your master channel when mixing already mixed tracks (Megamix)

Discussion in 'DJ Mixsets' started by Sylenth.Will.Fall, Jul 26, 2016.

  1. Sylenth.Will.Fall

    Sylenth.Will.Fall Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2015
    Messages:
    2,435
    Likes Received:
    1,660
    Whilst I'll just use a limiter for good quality recordings, this question is more to do with bad recordings that you just cannot find a better version of.

    Up until now I've used an EQ on individual channels to boost certain frequencies, or multiband compression. Maybe there is a better way I have overlooked?

     
  2.  
  3. mozee

    mozee Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2016
    Messages:
    639
    Likes Received:
    562
    Already mixed tracks are in a remix? Or are you trying to extract very specific elements from a recording where there are a lot of background noises and artifacts.

    If it is really important and worth the time, a pass through Izotope RX, or Adobe Audition in spectral edit mode might help a bit. Sony has one too, though I've never run into it so I do not know how effective it is but I would guess that it works pretty well. There are limits, and digital editing and restoration work usually eclipses the cost of just retracting something most of the time.

    If the performance is worth saving though, those are probably the best tools to use.
     
    • Interesting Interesting x 1
    • List
  4. artwerkski

    artwerkski Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2016
    Messages:
    683
    Likes Received:
    544
    Location:
    Neptune
    Depends the project, stem-mixing (sometimes already processed, sometimes not, but I'll do some leveling before mastering), djmix-mastering, etc. Usually; nothing. I've got a waves ssl comp on the bus and an l1 but I use those only for refference and when I bounce; nothings on my m-bus. If I happen to run shit through any outboard, I'll print to my pro tools box or the DA3000 and will not bounce within the DAW (for timing and jitter reasons bringing the signal back into the same box). If I'm too level a djmix, not mastering, I run it through Ozone. Sometimes when I have to do some restoration work from old tapes, or cassette tapes I'll usually reach for my dbx, C4 & L2.
    Cheers!
     
    • Interesting Interesting x 1
    • List
  5. rhythmatist

    rhythmatist Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2011
    Messages:
    1,270
    Likes Received:
    810
    Location:
    Chillicothe, Ohio, USA
    I run my mixes through some of those "mastering" plug ins and run A/B compare the pre-sets to the mix with nothing added. If it sounds better, I'm not above letting Saphira or something like that do what it wants. Many of those types of plug ins are mostly multi-band compression. If you are planning on letting people hear it on SoundCloud or YouTube, there are tutorials for mixes just for that type of media.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Interesting Interesting x 1
    • List
  6. I am of the mind that if you have the ability, sum your mix outside of the DAW enviornment.
     
    • Like Like x 2
    • Interesting Interesting x 1
    • List
  7. StupidifiedMoneky

    StupidifiedMoneky Member

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2016
    Messages:
    42
    Likes Received:
    16
    What goes on the master, stays on the master.
    Next question?
     
  8. Sylenth.Will.Fall

    Sylenth.Will.Fall Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2015
    Messages:
    2,435
    Likes Received:
    1,660
    As a crude example, say I wanted to build a mix featuring up to date highly compressed pop songs, with an 80's song downloaded from some website at very poor quality. I'm happy to leave the pop songs to their own devices and put a master compressor/limiter or just a limiter on the master channel, but that leaves me with a completely out of kilter 80's track that needs building up.

    I see where you're going with that idea, but the problem would still remain, mixing lots of new songs and sticking in an old 80's poorly mastered pre compressed track.



    Hmmm, Harmonic distortion. maybe I could try that.
    That still wouldn't resolve the issue I have though, because ozone would adjust everything, unless on individual tracks.

    I suppose the thing I'm after is a vst that allows me to find a track and copy the way that sounds and manipulates audio of all other tracks to sound similar.
     
  9. Nimbuss

    Nimbuss Platinum Record

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2015
    Messages:
    235
    Likes Received:
    162
    Location:
    Africa
    Don't forget about the Waves Center or similar plugins like the Brainworx bx_control, Mid Side techniques help a lot whenever I use a sample which has been through Youtube or bad codec, i'll use that to 'even out' whatever isn't blending or even the the Izotope Stereo enhancer just to mono the bass or spread the hats for example.. I'm no pro on Mid-side as i'm aware of how much damage it can do. But hey if nothing vanishes when referencing in mono who cares right?
     
  10. Sylenth.Will.Fall

    Sylenth.Will.Fall Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2015
    Messages:
    2,435
    Likes Received:
    1,660
    Working with Mid/Side has ALWAYS been a mystery to me. Thanks I will certainly look into that.
     
  11. artwerkski

    artwerkski Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2016
    Messages:
    683
    Likes Received:
    544
    Location:
    Neptune
    Best Answer
    ... you could have a look at Waves Q Clone.
     
  12. Sylenth.Will.Fall

    Sylenth.Will.Fall Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2015
    Messages:
    2,435
    Likes Received:
    1,660
    Am I right in thinking this will clone my hardware EQ???????????

    I've just seen Yoad Nevo explain how to do it. Man this is really exciting. thank you ever so much for this.
     
    Last edited: Jul 26, 2016
  13. subGENRE

    subGENRE Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2011
    Messages:
    2,476
    Likes Received:
    1,517
    Ozone can clone an eq as well. I think Pro q too. Another good one to liven up the kicks in old mixes is bx boom
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Interesting Interesting x 1
    • List
  14. The Teknomage

    The Teknomage Rock Star

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2015
    Messages:
    715
    Likes Received:
    488
    I know this is going to sound stupid, and it probably is, but couldn't you bounce the modern tracks down to the level of the 80's track, mix them, and try to bring them back up together.
     
    • Interesting Interesting x 1
    • List
  15. Sylenth.Will.Fall

    Sylenth.Will.Fall Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2015
    Messages:
    2,435
    Likes Received:
    1,660
    Wait.... Fab filter Q2 can clone an external EQ too?

    It's not stupid at all. I like your way of thinking. The thing is I might find among a mix of say 100 tracks (all 80's) 5 or 6 that sound as if they have a very low bitrate, and if I lowered all to their level I think that might take more work.
     
  16. mozee

    mozee Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2016
    Messages:
    639
    Likes Received:
    562
    I don't see why you need anything on the master buss, teat each track or each class of track as its own channel.

    Say you want to get into modern turdic loudness but have a few tracks for the 80s that are at 15 LUFS instead of the -7-5 LUFS that is standard now you leave the 2CH Sum Alone and just compress and limit on a bus.

    As far as the quality goes for some tracks that are heavily distorted and have compression artifacts and lossy aliasing , you should attempt to find a better source, even zynaptiq unchirp which does a great job as restoring some of those tracks has its limits.

    If you are doing this live, then that is the art of DJing but even then you have at least 2 channels and a DJ mixer use the volume knob and the AB slider to adjust transition and loudness, remember that loudness is somewhat a precieved power, which can be altered by changing the output power translating compressed loudness into SPL levels - the volume knob is always king.
     
  17. 23322332

    23322332 Rock Star

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2011
    Messages:
    694
    Likes Received:
    352
    All the modern tracks that are super loud have less details and sound more plastic, because of the artifacts from the overcompression.
    You can't mix tracks from the 80s with tracks from 2015 on the same volume via compression without losing not only sound quality, but also the soul of the music.
    All the idiots that listen to their mp3 and phone players in the subway every day will probably be deaf in their 40s.
    Sound quality doesn't equal loudness.
     
  18. jaymo99

    jaymo99 Platinum Record

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2015
    Messages:
    306
    Likes Received:
    171
    Location:
    Germany
    for EQ cloning I quite like Voxengo Curve EQ , just saying :winker:
     
  19. subGENRE

    subGENRE Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2011
    Messages:
    2,476
    Likes Received:
    1,517
     
  20. Sylenth.Will.Fall

    Sylenth.Will.Fall Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2015
    Messages:
    2,435
    Likes Received:
    1,660
    Thank you everyone for your suggestions. I've considered all the options you've given me. I think the best one for me is Waves Q clone Thanks again @artwerkski
     
  21. artwerkski

    artwerkski Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2016
    Messages:
    683
    Likes Received:
    544
    Location:
    Neptune
    U're very welcome! :winker:
     
Loading...
Loading...