seen these claims many times, i have been reading reports like the nist for years, as a physicist i stick to science, and the nist report is correct given the data, we have a great site that debunks these videos but it's in italian so i guess its irrelevant here..

 

just proof of heat, scientifically u have no basis to claim an inside job, unless u can demonstrate that friction doesnt produce heat.

 

http://www.ebtx.com/wtc/wtcfall.htm

 

melted steel. there has to be a source, it had of been something besides what we are told by the us govt. the oxygen was also low so fire could not continue to bun with out some other source even if it could the jet fuel would have to reach its maximum temp which even then is still not hot enough and the fuel could not do that with out other sources being added

 

Please see the topmost link on page 2.
It leads to Baker's 8-episode documentary, really worth seeing even though there are some mistakes.

I do not have answers to your questions, but with extensive search, I'm sure you'll find them.

 

this link is talking about weight having influence on free fall speed... Galileo is being raped

 

friction doesnt produce heat? for physics yes, why the shuttle needed a thermal shield?

 

the under mass the resistance mass

 

in a free fall? a collapse is a free fall.. speed isnt affected by inertial mass

 

*no* no the floors resisting the fall the fall started near the top on both towers so when it fell the bottom floors would have braced or at least slowed down the fall. see what i mean

NOTE: it was not free fall but not slow enough for nearly a 100 floors of concrete and steel resistance to be holding it up

 

no sorry, a collapse is a free fall, otherwise there is no collapse, yet the weight then is wrong, u must talk about pressure