Subtractive synthesizer conventional methods of signal flow?

Discussion in 'Synthesizers' started by salsantana, Jul 5, 2025 at 9:13 PM.

  1. salsantana

    salsantana Newbie

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2023
    Messages:
    1
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Chesapeake Bay, USA
    There are times when simply assembling the question is the most difficult step.......

    I THINK I notice the conventional method is to use the last oscillator (i.e: OSC 3) as the primary tone source(???).

    Any thoughts much appreciated...... one guess is that you can modulate a signal (i.e. OSC1's tone) with OSC 3 and also control the magnitude of THAT modulation from another source like LFO, sequencer, etc.

    Just curious why it nearly always appears the case to be that the last oscillator is the "boss" while the others just wait for something to do.
     
  2.  
  3. Usr4321

    Usr4321 Kapellmeister

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2025
    Messages:
    101
    Likes Received:
    46
    If a subtractive synth has 3 oscillators that 3rd one often has the ability to act an LFO. If it only has 2 osc, the second osc will get it if its available. Conversely, if cross modulation only has one source that tends to be on osc 1. One ring mod? Often osc 2. 2 ring mods? osc 1 and 2. Osc 1 and 2 got a toy but 3 of that thing would be silly? Put it on osc 3 (maybe a PW or noise). FM? AM? Continuously variable? Some synths all the oscs get it, some 1... maybe 3 modulates 1, maybe 2 modulates 3. Sub osc? Might be tied to osc 1. Might be it's own thing. All oscs having the ability to modulate any other osc? That exists too. Modulate any other destination anywhere in the chain? Sometimes.

    There's no rule that the extra lo freq has to be osc 3. Its just convenient so most makers do it that way.

    There is no convention in the sense of any standard across the board as to a 'primary tone' osc. Often there isn't a dominant tone, rather the waveform exiting the osc's stage is the result of blending the sources and all sources being necessary to create the final tone.

    All of this can vary considerably depending on the synth. Subtractive synthesis is just the method in which the waveform is shaped, not a prescription for any particular mandate of features or workflow (aside from, you know... subtracting frequencies). There are many variations on how much control you are given to do so.
     
  4. PulseWave

    PulseWave Rock Star

    Joined:
    May 4, 2025
    Messages:
    809
    Likes Received:
    406
    It depends on the synthesizer.

    I'm happy about a third oscillator (sound generator) because it offers more possibilities for shaping the sound. I often use the third oscillator as a sub-bass (octave transpose in the negative range) or I see if I can enrich the sound with it, depending on the controls offered by the synthesizer.
     
Loading...
Similar Threads - Subtractive synthesizer conventional Forum Date
What is Subtractive and Additive Synthesizers? Working with Sound Oct 26, 2014
AUv3 Digital Subtractive Synth | $11.99 | 13/12/22 Software News Dec 13, 2022
Reaper daw - reafir - subtractive Automatically build noise profile Reaper Oct 19, 2022
in sound design in subtractive synthesis when does phase matters? Working with Sound Aug 30, 2022
Xenobioz announces: Lynx - FREE Subtractive VST Synth Software News May 24, 2015
Loading...