SoundCloud changes policies to allow AI training on user content

Discussion in 'Ai for Music' started by tzzsmk, May 11, 2025 at 8:58 AM.

  1. curtified

    curtified Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2015
    Messages:
    800
    Likes Received:
    509
    In those companies you mention how do they organize their millions of workers that create, manage, and provide their services to us?
    Through paying them.

    How do they get the money to keep the lights on?
    Through being a business. Free tiers get ads, Pay tiers give money.
     
  2. curtified

    curtified Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2015
    Messages:
    800
    Likes Received:
    509
    A server is just a small fraction of the upkeep. 10 a year wont even cover it in the slightest.

    Too many moving parts to list. But one big one no one thinks about is legal costs to keep a company. Most of the money goes to lawsuits.

    Uber alone has an entire skyscraper in san fransisco that houses their legal department.
     
  3. Arabian_jesus

    Arabian_jesus Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2019
    Messages:
    1,004
    Likes Received:
    783
    It means that you need contact them and tell them that you don't agree to your music being used to train AIs. Same thing as with Facebook/Meta a while back. People needed to contact them to say that they don't agree with Meta taking pictures from users Facebook and Insta accounts to train Meta AI.
     
  4. PulseWave

    PulseWave Kapellmeister

    Joined:
    May 4, 2025
    Messages:
    120
    Likes Received:
    41
    AudiSexPro, our forum has 78,982 members. If everyone pays €10 per year, that's €789,820 per year. That could definitely pay for a server. But as you know, that's not going to happen, and so we don't need to think any further. The battle has long been lost.

    Uber is a platform economy that doesn't manufacture anything itself, but rather offers services; they are massively attacking the taxi industry worldwide.
     
  5. ilovepizza

    ilovepizza Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2025
    Messages:
    18
    Likes Received:
    8
    Sorry not sorry but saying these companies farm user data, dont fairly pay royalties or share advertising money with artists, train ai with user content and so on to "keep the lights on" is total bullshit. When the offices are in the most expensive high street high rises in major cities, average low level employee incomes are low to mid six figures and lets not forget multiple ceo/owners personally "earning" billions of dollars in cash money each, yeah, no. These a-holes have completely rigged the game and are in bed with the major labels and some of the performing rights organizations, basically across the entire board of the music industry. Pure greed for money at any and all costs under the disguise of running at a loss in the name of helping indie arts. Get tf outta here man :thumbsdown:
     
  6. PulseWave

    PulseWave Kapellmeister

    Joined:
    May 4, 2025
    Messages:
    120
    Likes Received:
    41
    It's about participation and self-determination.
    We only have one right when it comes to the big companies: to buy or not to buy, to use or not to use.
     
  7. PulseWave

    PulseWave Kapellmeister

    Joined:
    May 4, 2025
    Messages:
    120
    Likes Received:
    41
    Big capital always wins; they have the money. SoundCloud has already gone bankrupt. First layoffs, then layoffs, then the investor...!

    - SoundCloud fires 40 percent of employees - 2017 Music service in crisis - offices in London and San Francisco close

    Streaming service - SoundCloud on the verge of bankruptcy - August 11, 2017
    - Company urgently needs fresh capital – Investors want a new CEO

    Investors demand €170 million. In 2015, the company reported a loss of €51 million on revenue of €21 million. According to Ljung, SoundCloud now needs $170 million in additional capital, as Axios reports. However, investors want a new CEO at the helm. Instead of Ljung, former Vimeo CEO Kerry Trainor is set to take over.

    The music platform SoundCloud could be sold by the end of the year. Shareholders Raine Group, a US investment firm, and Temasek Holdings, Singapore's sovereign wealth fund, are talking about a "possible auction of the company," according to Sky News. Raine and Temasek hold the majority of SoundCloud's shares.
     
  8. curtified

    curtified Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2015
    Messages:
    800
    Likes Received:
    509
    we are a community of a sister site that offers music tools at no cost. Im assuming the small number of the participating users here might not all throw that money at a platform that costs more development costs plus severs.

    yes that is a part of what uber is. The legal side encompasses, drivers, riders, accidents, sexual assaults, uber eats damages… etc etc etc..

    Just trying to get you to think broadly and apply it to a hypothetical music platform.
    Record labels suing, samples, illegal uploads, defamation…… etc etc etc.

    that’s just a factor of moving parts.

    if you Google you will see how Spotify was sued by everyone in its years of inception. This also applies to SoundCloud.
     
  9. curtified

    curtified Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2015
    Messages:
    800
    Likes Received:
    509
    I agree the labels are always forward facing they are here for the artists but actually aren’t.

    even in the lawsuits against Suno & udio they keep throwing the word artist around. But in reality they don’t want to loose value in the catalog they are sitting on. Especially after the large purchase of all the masters that were made during the pandemic.

    they need a return on investment and new tech is threatening their old rusty business model
     
  10. PulseWave

    PulseWave Kapellmeister

    Joined:
    May 4, 2025
    Messages:
    120
    Likes Received:
    41
    Most of them aren't free, they're illegal!
    No, you just won't be able to get them excited about setting up something of their own. You could open your own studio using membership or club dues. But you find that there are too few of them, because either they don't understand, are too stingy, or have been brought up to do what they are told.
    Can you elaborate a little on the hypothetical music platform?
    We still live in a constitutional state; you can be sued at any time, and then you hire a lawyer and have them defend you.
     
  11. PulseWave

    PulseWave Kapellmeister

    Joined:
    May 4, 2025
    Messages:
    120
    Likes Received:
    41
    It's all just hot air; what they say isn't what they do. Follow the money.
     
  12. ArticStorm

    ArticStorm Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2011
    Messages:
    8,200
    Likes Received:
    4,254
    Location:
    AudioSexPro
    the biggest problem i have with them - is not asking, but just changing TOS or luring people into a program, see LANDR only recently ...They need to be transparent about that.
     
  13. PulseWave

    PulseWave Kapellmeister

    Joined:
    May 4, 2025
    Messages:
    120
    Likes Received:
    41
    Today, it's done this way because it's legally required; otherwise, the companies are committing a criminal offense. By accepting our terms of service or license agreement, they consent to us continuing to use your data. If you don't check the box at the bottom, you can't use their service.
     
  14. Somnambulist

    Somnambulist Rock Star

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2024
    Messages:
    580
    Likes Received:
    473
    Sure traffic costs money as does the cost of the blade server(s)/ Virtual server(s) for hosting and a decent Cisco or equivalent router and a hardware firewall, as does maintenance. That stated, it is still hosting what doesn't belong to the hoster unless the hoster owns the tunes as well. I have some friends that investigated this and the marketing involved to successfully compete with the major streamers outweighed the practicality.
    The idea is good and a pure one of fair due to the composers who aren't A.I. but it will take a lot more than $10-$20 from even a thousand people. The hundreds of thousands possibly more and convincing people to change from their existing streamers means the marketing has no room for error to do something like it.

    I'm not trying to rain on your parade, just saying that many are on the same page and in order to make money, you need a lot of money to start with.
     
    Last edited: May 12, 2025 at 11:31 PM
Loading...
Similar Threads - SoundCloud changes policies Forum Date
Mastering/Mixing Track - Soundcloud changes waveform? Mixing and Mastering Apr 30, 2016
Preferred Tool for downloading from Soundcloud Software Sep 16, 2024
10 house/deep/minimal/micro tracks of my own - mixed - 15 minutes - Soundcloud Our Music Sep 1, 2024
Deep vocal house track - Day By Day (on Soundcloud) Our Music Aug 10, 2024
Soundcloud Audio Share Alternatives? Internet for Musician Apr 2, 2023
Loading...