Should I be bussing to 2-buss then master?

Discussion in 'DAW' started by MrRobRancor, Jan 20, 2016.

  1. MrRobRancor

    MrRobRancor Ultrasonic

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2014
    Messages:
    98
    Likes Received:
    27
    Hey guys, excuse me if I'm getting my terms mixed up but I'm new to this, should I bus all my tracks to a 2 buss then to the master or just buss everything to the master? what are the advantages of doing it this way as opposed to just using a master buss? thanks guys cheers
     
  2.  
  3. Ziko

    Ziko Guest

    Sounds like an interesting question :)
     
  4. SyNtH.

    SyNtH. Platinum Record

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2013
    Messages:
    402
    Likes Received:
    229
    Well what are you using on the bus? It all depends of the context of whats used, and what you are bussing specifically.
     
  5. coolbeanz

    coolbeanz Platinum Record

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2012
    Messages:
    386
    Likes Received:
    257
    Location:
    Babylon
    sh*t, i thought that was standard operating procedure. :dunno:

    truth is, u can either do it, or not; it's up to you & what works for you & your workflow. there are no rules when creating.

    i run my vocal tracks (mono) into a stereo bus, and the same for instruments/instrumentals. after that, i run the beat and vocal busses to a submix bus to keep my master bus free & clear of any effects/processes. i didn't always do this, but once i figured out that it really helps...a lot...i've stuck to it in some fashion ever since.

    the advantage is not having to put the same effects across multiple tracks, which would probably eat up CPU after awhile. instead, u can use one effect for many tracks sent to the bus. then that buss can be routed to another bus, and another bus, or another bus for more processes, if desired.

    good luck!
    :bow:
     
  6. Baxter

    Baxter Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2011
    Messages:
    3,843
    Likes Received:
    2,668
    Location:
    Sweden
    If you need bussing things, then bus them.
    It's up to you to decide.

    Using busses can have many advantages, both sound design-wise and mixing-wise.
     
    Last edited: Jan 20, 2016
  7. ovalf

    ovalf Platinum Record

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2012
    Messages:
    897
    Likes Received:
    217
    Location:
    Brazil
    More busses: more flexibility: fine tuning: better sound (if you do well): better pre master: faster master
     
  8. Nimbuss

    Nimbuss Platinum Record

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2015
    Messages:
    235
    Likes Received:
    162
    Location:
    Africa
    It would depend on what elements you have in your mix, a real world example would be:

    - If you wanted to send all your drums through a compressor but keep your synths untouched
    or
    - Add some tape emulation to your synths but keep your drums clean.

    Having a 'drum bus or 'synth bus' would give you the flexibility to do that.
     
  9. stefodis

    stefodis Producer

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2015
    Messages:
    99
    Likes Received:
    86
    I always use a summing 2bus (or submix) before the daw "master bus", it makes it easy to insert reference tracks, routed to the daw master bus, so they are left untouched by the processing on the bus "submix".

    Edit:
    For referencing, you can also use the "Magic A/B" plugin, but i kinda like the old way...
     
Loading...
Similar Threads - Should bussing buss Forum Date
Should I buy Serum or phaseplant I think they’re both missing some features Software Apr 17, 2024
Nobody should mix on NS10's in 2024 Lounge Mar 20, 2024
Should I really need a condenser mic? Mixing and Mastering Mar 17, 2024
why you should USE Hardware synths Software Mar 16, 2024
Why You Should Delete 80% Of Your Plugins Mixing and Mastering Mar 1, 2024
Loading...