Pan Law

Discussion in 'Working with Sound' started by Zenarcist, Jan 9, 2024.

  1. Zenarcist

    Zenarcist Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2012
    Messages:
    4,289
    Likes Received:
    2,741
    Location:
    Planet Earth
    What's the general consensus on here regarding pan laws?
     
  2.  
  3. mild pump milk

    mild pump milk Russian Milk Drunkard

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2014
    Messages:
    2,789
    Likes Received:
    2,382
    Location:
    Russia
    Perceived volume compensation a bit, roughly? Console emulation style? Versus digital math perfection? Don't know exactly.
    But this is what may differentiate among DAWs summing engines..... Also 32 bit float vs 64 bit float accuracy, PDC compensation (milliseconds delay, causing other phase summing etc) and other details.... Audio engines maybe not the same due to some algos...
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Interesting Interesting x 1
    • List
  4. xorome

    xorome Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2021
    Messages:
    1,176
    Likes Received:
    859
    I've been using the 3 dB pan law in my stuff - it's most common and pretty close to a circle. I think you're fine with 3 dB or 4.5 dB, those yield the least 'wtf' results. Avoid 6 dB and 0 dB 'no-law' laws. Those make it so that you're panning along straight lines instead of a round circle. Like strafing left and right in a videogame when you need to turn your head.
     
  5. Will Kweks

    Will Kweks Rock Star

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2023
    Messages:
    564
    Likes Received:
    333
    Do you do any "dynamic" panning, automation or such? If not, don't worry about it, your ears will set the stereo image for you. But anything moving then you have to try things out not to have things jumping from side to side too harshly. 3dB should do the trick. m/s then pan is another thing but best not to mix these up too much unless you know what you're doing.
     
Loading...