No more ad-blocking in the future?

Discussion in 'Internet for Musician' started by ArticStorm, Jul 26, 2023.

  1. ArticStorm

    ArticStorm Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2011
    Messages:
    7,847
    Likes Received:
    4,021
    Location:
    AudioSexPro
    The thing is called Web Environment Integrity API, which is some sort of DRM for browser.
    Google is trying to get back at giving us all the ads we deserve or missed over the last decade.

    Here is a detailed article about this:
    https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2023/07/googles-web-integrity-api-sounds-like-drm-for-the-web/

    This really looks bad and so far the only browser not relying on Chromium is Mozilla Firefox.
    But so far i read, the big problem is that web pages should verify if the browser is altered via scripts or extensions - this sounds like a good way to really make the web saver for us, but it also seems to hold the potential for making it impossible to operate extensions, which block ads or other web page scripts, we dont want.

    About Firefox, this could mean, people, who dont use Chromium based browser, wont be able to visit certain pages like youtube or whatever page decides to verify the browser, as the page simply wont load.
    This also massively will destroy the idea of an open web.

    Not sure this will look like in the future. I simply hope that somebody will come up with something, because i am simply not up for enjoying massive Advertisments before i installed an adblocker.
    If nothing helps, i will simply reduce usage, if there comes no solution around for this.
    (Or alternative ways, like downloading youtube videos, instead of watching them on youtube itself.)

    Any ideas or thoughts about this?

    Here is the official Google repo about Web Enviroment Integrity API: https://github.com/RupertBenWiser/Web-Environment-Integrity/blob/main/explainer.md
     
    • Interesting Interesting x 6
    • Like Like x 2
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • List
  2.  
  3. xorome

    xorome Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2021
    Messages:
    1,179
    Likes Received:
    861
    If this means Apple could lose out on profits, because websites can have DRM that's just as potent as native apps, then Apple will surely sabotage this as hard as they can. No sidestepping the app store.

    And if they don't.. I'll use websites that don't require integrity checks instead.

    Skimming over the proposal, I'm under the impression that ultimately the browser needs to decide whether its environment is 'compromised' or not. Unless I'm getting it wrong, I think browsers could just always respond 'clean browser' to every request?
     
  4. mk_96

    mk_96 Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2020
    Messages:
    1,103
    Likes Received:
    771
    Location:
    Your heart
    I know jackshit about how any of this works, but the Github thingy says under "non goals" that they don't want to interfere with plugins so...that's good i guess?

    I sure hope they don't force ads on us more than they already do. Fuck ads, fuck having to pay for not seeing ads, fuck the internet, crime will be my new source of entertainment. See you in jail mfers.
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
    • Like Like x 2
    • List
  5. ArticStorm

    ArticStorm Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2011
    Messages:
    7,847
    Likes Received:
    4,021
    Location:
    AudioSexPro
    Safari is based on chromium so far i know. Same for Edge, Opera, etc
     
  6. ArticStorm

    ArticStorm Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2011
    Messages:
    7,847
    Likes Received:
    4,021
    Location:
    AudioSexPro
    a huge problem is this attester things, which basically works as a next-gen DRM i have read.

    Ofc they write no-goals, but look, youtube, google search all lose out on its users installing and using extensions, which block ads.
    (i use now an adblocker on youtube for a decade, i get really annoyed, when i watch something on my phone, which doesnt support an adblocker (youtube-app)).
    And youtube is trying around with detecting adblockers and extensions for a while - so the best solution to this would be actual make it impossible to use an adblocker and here comes the attester idea in.
    Youtube will ask the browser, hey do you have an adblocker installed? YES - well then only 3 videos for you. OR deactivate/uninstall the plugin.
    See where this is going? Its a control from the page on choices the user has to make to use it.
    Now imagine somebody comes around with Firefox which wont support this attester idea, basically youtube asks, can i verify? Firefox doesnt answer - means you cant use use youtube with firefox.

    If you look more around the github and click on issues and one of the last issues there, you will see the google employees have limited commenting on the issues. Which is a true statement for that they are aware of what they are doing and dont want to discuss it with the people there.

    My guess is that Google wants to sell us this shit as user improvement, while it actual deactivates extensions and adds surveillance and monopoly structure on top of it, to re-enforce more ads on the users of the internet.
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
    • Like Like x 1
    • Interesting Interesting x 1
    • List
  7. Sylenth.Will.Fall

    Sylenth.Will.Fall Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2015
    Messages:
    2,668
    Likes Received:
    1,846
    What about Tor Browser? Yes it uses Mozilla's network but it can access the dark web too, meaning it can bypass a lot of stuff you don't want, whilst allowing access to loads of stuff you.. (in case anyone is watching) ALSO don't want :)
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Interesting Interesting x 1
    • List
  8. ArticStorm

    ArticStorm Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2011
    Messages:
    7,847
    Likes Received:
    4,021
    Location:
    AudioSexPro
    The problem will be the attester idea (a monitoring module, which will answer if the webpage asks stuff - so far only which browser, which OS)
    Sure you could false send that you are using Chrome, but then the page would still ask for the verification, which you cant fake.

    Torbrowser wont have this monitor, so i assume you still cant access the page, which want that verification.

    Again i really hope, once this rolls out for real, that the internet will find a solution to bypass it - or the simplest solution would be to just stopping the usage of the webpages, which are going to enforce it.
    Basically punishing the users of this API. But i guess the normal user andy, will comply with it and just "enjoy" ads again.
     
  9. lxfsn

    lxfsn Platinum Record

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2021
    Messages:
    344
    Likes Received:
    259
    Soon in 2024:

    Google.Chrome.v.154.0.5735.134-incl.emulator.and.keygen.read.nfo-R2R
     
    • Funny Funny x 16
    • Like Like x 2
    • List
  10. Demloc

    Demloc Platinum Record

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2020
    Messages:
    302
    Likes Received:
    260
    Don't know but right off the hat what you are telling crash with a lot of already deployed privacy's laws on the EU.
     
  11. Sylenth.Will.Fall

    Sylenth.Will.Fall Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2015
    Messages:
    2,668
    Likes Received:
    1,846
    Mind you AS, I'm using Win 7 so I wont be able to update Firefox any further anyway.
     
  12. ArticStorm

    ArticStorm Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2011
    Messages:
    7,847
    Likes Received:
    4,021
    Location:
    AudioSexPro
    So you cant use in the future any page, which will use that mechanism.
    thats what people pointed out on github, there was no answer, the issue was just locked.

    Maybe im overreacting here, but i fear google really wants this very badly and we should be prepared.
     
    • Interesting Interesting x 1
    • List
  13. Melodic Reality

    Melodic Reality Rock Star

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2023
    Messages:
    679
    Likes Received:
    435
    I have no issue with legit ad's, but being bombarded with shady porn sites and scams, pop up's, no thanks, I have no issue to see ad banner on some page, it doesn't really take anything from my experience, but have issue if they are shoved down my throat or take away from my experience.
     
  14. famouslut

    famouslut Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2015
    Messages:
    1,420
    Likes Received:
    929
    I guess this is some weird Denuvo-esque handshake that won't work w/ ECH (or TLS?) anyway? How would they even know the whole network supports TB (token binding)? Leaves it open to bots? Seems like a nice (dumb) idea, but they'll be gifting competitors their userbase if they try to eRmAgErD SeCuRiTy anyone blocking ads! YT is basically unusable shit w/o extensions.
     
  15. Crinklebumps

    Crinklebumps Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2017
    Messages:
    995
    Likes Received:
    721
    Location:
    UK
    If it makes them watch more dog food ads I'm all for it.
     
    • Funny Funny x 2
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • List
  16. ArticStorm

    ArticStorm Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2011
    Messages:
    7,847
    Likes Received:
    4,021
    Location:
    AudioSexPro
    Remember everybody is using Chromium as base today for their browser. (there is only Firefox left, which a few projects are based on).

    I mean MS is playing stupid too with Edge, Opera forcing AI shit (you cant disable it anymore like you could in the past.)

    So we are left with two browser Engines. All the other ones are discontinued.
    And if you look at how many people are still using FF:

    https://gs.statcounter.com/browser-market-share

    now thats 90% market share for chrome-based browser usage (im writting from a chromium force too right now, but i still have FF installed and could use it)

    so my point is there is no real competitor left, so Google just could do it and people would have to take it.
     
  17. phumb-reh

    phumb-reh Guest

    Well, Manifest v3 was a Google as well and they had to pull it back because no one wanted to use it. Meaning most extension developers stayed out of it. So I'm guessing the same thing applies here. Meaning Google had to put it aside.

    Also, Chromium has the de-Googled variant that a lot of people use. Brave (which I don't use) has avoided this shittery, and Vivaldi (which I do use) too, both of them have stayed out of the whole Manifest v3 business, and I expect that they'll do the same here.

    It's a shit idea like FLoC.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Winner Winner x 1
    • List
  18. phumb-reh

    phumb-reh Guest

    Oh, and KTHML (part of KDE project) was the base for WebKit, which Google forked to create Blink. But Apple stayed with WK and improved it, so good luck to G trying to sidestep the most used mobile browser there is.
     
    • Interesting Interesting x 1
    • List
  19. famouslut

    famouslut Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2015
    Messages:
    1,420
    Likes Received:
    929
    I mean, I use FF only, but there are quite a few alternatives to YT; the way it's going, simply not using it is the most likely option? Additional time suck? No thanks. Given how many of my friends stream on twitch, that's another. Google's new slogan? "Just be Elon".
     
  20. zadiac

    zadiac Kapellmeister

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2022
    Messages:
    129
    Likes Received:
    61
    Remember what Master Qui-Gon Jinn said,: "There's always a bigger fish". They can force ads on us, but there'll always be someone who will find a way to block them. Trust our hacker saviours to find a way to f*** the system.
    Also:
    “Sure, the boys in Ryan's lab can make it hack-proof. But that don't mean
    we ain't gonna hack it.”
    ― Pablo Navarro
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
    • List
  21. xorome

    xorome Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2021
    Messages:
    1,179
    Likes Received:
    861
    Yeah, that's why I'm cheering on Apple. They have their own browser engine and use every opportunity they can to sabotage Google's efforts to make the web a better replacement for native apps. Usually under the guise of "we care so much about your privacy".

    Go comically evil company #2, I'm counting on you to beat comically evil company #1!

    Firefox, Chrome, Safari, Ladybird and Flow Browser are the only independent browser engines still in development that can display more than the most basic of websites.
     
Loading...
Loading...