New dynamic range?

Discussion in 'Mixing and Mastering' started by argyrisk, May 22, 2014.

  1. argyrisk

    argyrisk Noisemaker

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2013
    Messages:
    7
    Likes Received:
    6
    Location:
    Athens Greece
    Hello everybody, i want to ask you, what your opinion of new mastering technices
    especially in house music,with dynamic range about 4, or 5, is this the end of music, or distortion
    and overcompressing is the rule now? This new track i like it so much and the dynamic range
    of this track is 4, something tips at mastering 2014, if you know, share these!
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3drqHM-Ofmk
     
  2.  
  3. Introninja

    Introninja Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2013
    Messages:
    1,525
    Likes Received:
    883
    Location:
    Location Location
    Not my cup of tea... i try to Master @-3db or -6db to preserve the harmonics not the Hard attacks but just IMO *yes*
     
  4. lonewolf000

    lonewolf000 Newbie

    Joined:
    May 8, 2013
    Messages:
    78
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Inside my cat house
    yeah. squeeze the juice out of them. -50db gain reduction
     
  5. MrLyannMusic

    MrLyannMusic Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2014
    Messages:
    1,319
    Likes Received:
    671
    Location:
    Tunis, Tunisia
    it depends, and there is no factors, some times you only compress add some exciters, a little bit eq and you're done, some times you need a lot of compression with a multiband..., don't want even to talk about it,anyway it doesn't depend on genre or anything...

    anyway i would share your opinion, mastering these days is not the same, some times i hear a really good mastering/quality that makes me attracted, some times they over compress, with 0 dynamic range, anyway i still love the old school mastering, wish when you hear a track, every things goes smoothly together, i've lost faith in some producers as well, they used to have a good mixing/mastering tracks, now every thing is loud. :(

    probably because lately sounds are aimed to be played in public, not the same as few years ago wish we was hearing it at home.

    :dunno: :dunno: :dunno:
     
  6. gurujon

    gurujon Kapellmeister

    Joined:
    May 28, 2012
    Messages:
    123
    Likes Received:
    59
    The so-called “Loudness War” is entirely based on a modern myth – a fairy-tale full of nonsense that has somehow hypnotised the entire music industry for the last ten years – and is permanently damaging the music we listen to as a result.

    http://dynamicrangeday.co.uk/
     
  7. Kwissbeats

    Kwissbeats Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2014
    Messages:
    1,566
    Likes Received:
    655
    meh I heard this before,
    some times it's even impossible to get my long term dynamic range above 10 so thats were I leave it
     
  8. Kookaboo

    Kookaboo Rock Star

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2011
    Messages:
    1,456
    Likes Received:
    429
    Location:
    Here and there.
    *yes* Yes that's mostly true……but on the other hand if a track sounds too low on volume it will be quickly ignored because our ears tell us that the "louder" version is better! The music industry with all its servants are just taking advantages on the human psychology about this fact. :grooves: :headbang:
     
  9. Baxter

    Baxter Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2011
    Messages:
    3,910
    Likes Received:
    2,753
    Location:
    Sweden
    4 what? 4 out of 5? -4dB Average RMS?

    Interesting that the track (on youtube) peaks at -3dB, instead of -0.3dB (as used to avoid mp3 compression clipping artifacts).

    My mastering tips would be EQ, compression, parallel compression, exciter, lowcut, highcut and limiter.

    Not to be an ass, but most of you write db and not dB. Please, show some respect to Alexander Graham Bell. ;)
     
  10. gurujon

    gurujon Kapellmeister

    Joined:
    May 28, 2012
    Messages:
    123
    Likes Received:
    59
    Yeah, but if you follow my link ( http://dynamicrangeday.co.uk/about/) and watch the vids there, you will see that the dynamic mixes actually sound louder than the squashed mixes :)

    Plus the squashed music causes listen fatigue and damage to the ears.
     
  11. MNDSTRM

    MNDSTRM Platinum Record

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2011
    Messages:
    631
    Likes Received:
    276
    Location:
    Toronto
    Professional, world class, hip hop albums are even mastered at -5,-6 dB rms, like a couple tracks on Drake's Nothing was the same.
    Mastering at that level is perfectly fine if you automate the master channel of your mix.

    I personally don't care as much about the dynamic range as I do regarding how the transients sound.

    I typically close my eyes and push my limiter till the transients sound funny, and with my secret limiting chain that's usually -5 dB rms and then I back off a bit for some air.

    Whats messing up music is when kids try to crush instrumentals to those volumes, not knowing they they're pretty much rendering the track useless.

    Agreed, can we also write dBfs? please show some respect to the Full Scale :wink:
     
  12. Baxter

    Baxter Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2011
    Messages:
    3,910
    Likes Received:
    2,753
    Location:
    Sweden
    Agreed. :)

    Spot on!
     
  13. Pipotron3000

    Pipotron3000 Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2013
    Messages:
    1,228
    Likes Received:
    616
    Most modern tricks are based on psycho acoustic...like MP3 compression :rofl:
    You "squash" more, but at the same time, you play with generated harmonics, transients...what i call "micro-dynamic"

    There are three levels of dynamic to me :
    -Macro dynamic (chorus louder than verse, automated gain, start softer than end...) : Several seconds, even minutes scale
    -"Normal", "Regular" dynamic (what we mostly speak about...and too much) : Around under a second scale (compression, limiting...)
    -Micro Dynamic : transients, sharp harmonics spikes, distortion variations...under 10 (even 5) ms scale

    After that point, the more you "squash" your audio cubes, the more you need to EQ and/or multiband to take the "cubes" in place :bleh: And more "micro dynamic" to separate them in your brain.
    Especially when you put your tracks in a mastering chain after...that's why most ppl will "crash test" they mixes with a "dummy" mastering chain, even if they don't master their own tracks.

    My opinion : you can do GOOD aggressive GR...but it takes a lot more skills than most of the tracks i hear.

    I love metal, but how many time i heard sub basses distorting all the mix ? Not so hard to lower gain and do some high pass...
    How many time i heard double kick making even the cymbals "pumping" like in a badly mixed trance mix ? Multiband drum bus or kick track direct on master
    And more and more...
    Worst being tracks making you "feel" they were nicely mixed...but totally ruined by a bad mastering :rofl:

    You want another headache ? Think there is enough computing power in any device (MP3 player, car radio, CD player...) for at least 10 years to do "mastering" like process (like broadcast racks do on the radio/TV...) directly in the device.
    Multiband, exciter, bass loudness...
    And so, this could have been implemented since the beginning of the loudness war...without squashing the signal on media but when listening only :rofl:

    Good headache ! (because this is what i get when i listen to most of those "modern" tracks...i lower gain...and after i stop listening) :mates:
     
  14. Evorax

    Evorax Rock Star

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2013
    Messages:
    1,764
    Likes Received:
    320
    Location:
    Bowerstone Castle
    If you got a volume knob at your hands with some pretty powerful speakers, you can make the loud ass song to sound quiet and nice (just by keeping the volume low) and you can make the unsquashed song to bring fatigue too if you crank up the volume till you hear nothing else in the room. :rofl:
    A squashed song is not fatiguing as long as you don't check it on max volume on a powerful sound system. :rofl: :break:
    Anyway, Kook is right, the so called "Loudness War" is still available for the commercial masses because the labels and music industry overall take advantage over human psychology, so why not? Ask any young LISTENER, not producer or musician, they will ALWAYS choose the louder song, just because they feel the "louder" sounding better, while we, the musicians/producers/trained ears will know the unsquashed song is better. We sometimes just don't have a choice... we just have to feed up their requests/preferences... We can't tell them "We will provide you unsquashed music, ok?" while they actually raving and yelling for "bring us only squaaaashed caaakes", can we say no?
    If we do it for a living, we don't have choice... if we do it for ourselves or other purposes which don't require squashed music... then yea', we can keep it low. Drop it low, drop it low :grooves:
     
  15. gurujon

    gurujon Kapellmeister

    Joined:
    May 28, 2012
    Messages:
    123
    Likes Received:
    59
    Its not the same, a squashed song have a constant maximized soundpressure and is more damaging to the ears, even at lower amplitudes. This is backed up by statistics and not just my opinion :)
     
  16. Andrew

    Andrew AudioSEX Maestro

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2011
    Messages:
    1,993
    Likes Received:
    1,215
    Location:
    Between worlds
    I'm going to me very BOLD so please excuse my style.
    In my opinion the 'louder sounds better' is a myth. It's just about equipment used and room acoustic properties.
    Actually 'quieter sound better' should be established as main motto, here's why:
    Louder music attracts attention immediately, but when it remains loud for long time it starts to sound dull and fatiguing. All transients are lost in punching bass that your ears starts to limit (just like Auto Gain Control) and sparkling highs becomes bloated and faded. When someone (not just Someone :bleh: ) listen to your track at very low volumes (about 45dB above ATH), they start to hear all the distortion and pumping just like on a silver platter.
    Quiet music does not attract attention immediately and the brain has to adjust, which is somewhat uncomfortable at first, but then you'll start to hear all the subtle nuances and start to feel the Nirvana behind music. Also listening over 2 hours is no longer a difficulty. You'll also train your ears to distinguish various sounds and become more sensitive. *yes* (tried it)

    Music industry today however is about HERE and NOW and STAGGERING SALES, that's why most audiophiles are going alternative routes. It would be hell of a job to explain the 'quiet music' concept to adolescent female with earbuds and iPad, but once you pop HD800 on her head, she will probably becomes conscious about the change :rofl:
     
  17. Evorax

    Evorax Rock Star

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2013
    Messages:
    1,764
    Likes Received:
    320
    Location:
    Bowerstone Castle
    I have nothing much to say, i bow to your statement. :bow:
    All this squashed music thing is based on the "first moment impression" fact, which is clearly a "tactic" for their digital sales, that's why the loudness war can't stop yet.
     
  18. argyrisk

    argyrisk Noisemaker

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2013
    Messages:
    7
    Likes Received:
    6
    Location:
    Athens Greece
    Thanks for your answers, but i am wondering also how in this track with dynamic range at 4 dB,

    there is no distortion (or not so much), and it sounds also too clean and warm?
     
  19. Khoa Tran

    Khoa Tran Newbie

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    9
    Likes Received:
    0
    I found a cool tip here on SOS:
    http://www.soundonsound.com/sos/jan11/articles/qanda-0111-1.htm

    When it needed, I can make my songs pretty loud, about +4 to +5 db without distortion, but the problem is that loudness kills my song's dynamic.
    Example: the piano & vocal chop sound fine with the beat (part that has kick, bassline, etc...) but in the breakdown part, they just suddenly become very loud. And I have no idea how to fix it.
    My master bus usually has:
    SSL Comp
    EQ
    Multiband Comp
    Fab filter limit
    Ozone 5 (reverb & stereo img)
    Waves L3

    But I don't like to create very loud songs anyway, I love the emotional, smooth songs :D

    PS: sorry for my bad english, hope u guys understand what I mean
     
  20. Iggy

    Iggy Rock Star

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    1,090
    Likes Received:
    434
    Location:
    The stage, man
    Today's (lack of) dynamic range is terrible. I try not to go past the mid-Nineties. in terms of overall dynamic clarity, so I keep my average RMS at around -14 dB or so on a master. If I can't see my snare hits in a waveform, it's too loud.
     
  21. Andrew

    Andrew AudioSEX Maestro

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2011
    Messages:
    1,993
    Likes Received:
    1,215
    Location:
    Between worlds
    The great news is that people are finally getting aware. :thumbsup:
    One way to end this war is to decrease demand for squashed albums.
     
Loading...
Similar Threads - dynamic range Forum Date
Dynamic Range Mixing and Mastering Feb 13, 2024
Looking for a mass LUFS / dynamic range analyzer Software / Vst Software Sep 5, 2023
Keyscape dynamic range sucks or just me? Software Jan 6, 2023
Massenburg DesignWorks Debuts New MDWDRC2-Native Dynamic Range Controller Plugin Software News Nov 23, 2022
how is dynamic range measured? Working with Sound Aug 18, 2022
Loading...