Yes, I do read what I write. When I said pros use it, I ain't bluffing.

1. Jon Castelli used 2 instances of soothe2 on the master of a billie eilish song and 1 instance of soothe2 on another song on the same billie eilish album.

2. Jon Castelli also used that GULLFOSS on the Billie Eilish Album, On the Master of one of the songs he was mixing.

3. Illangelo used Gullfoss on the master of the song "alone again" I think if I remember correctly.

(Source of the above points: MixWithTheMasters)

4. You know Ozone came up with their own spectral modules in Ozone. That alone should be an indicator to you that these spectral things are getting more common day by day even in mastering.

5. In the Ozone Maximizer, The "Transient" & "Modern" mode uses some kind of spectral technology behind the scenes in only these 2 specific modes.
I read this one somewhere I don't remember rightnow.

Thank You for insulting me with your kind words!

 

If you have an extremely dynamic song. Too dynamic, fluctuations / peaks of 20-30db, it can really help. I will sometimes automate gain on 8th or 1/4 notes even. Stray peaks that just need some taming before any dynamics tools. Some additional tricks i'll use from time to time:

1. Automation of mid/side eq. Opening and closing the sides using a high shelf. Excellent in a build up in EDM. Ramp the sides up during the build so it becomes big and wide and exciting, then close it back down in the drop so it becomes centered and punchy. Sometimes the opposite will work, ramping down so it becomes narrow and focused during the build, and the drop becomes huge and wide.

2. Automate simple gain throughout sections. Take a pop song. Verse A - (static), Verse B - (+1db), PreCh breadown - (-1.5db), Ch Drop - (+1db), and so on.

3. Reverb automation, which can be more of a creative effect, but a simple touch of 5%, barely noticeable can subtly enhance sections or when removed can create focus and punch.

4. Clipper - Say you have a general clipper set, just shaving off 1db or so, push it a bit more in the ch / drop to create more harmonics and energy. Shit i'll sometimes really push it, and then back down on the output at the same time, so its more crunchy and harmonically rich, but not blatantly louder.

 

That's very solid advice. How do you feel about static Mid-Side EQ? I'm having good results with It with a particular song, although that seems to be entering the "changing the mix" territory, which might make some clients uncomfortable.

 

I use it all the time. It really depends on the song / genre and the client. If the client gives you an insane sounding reference, and their song sounds like a litter box, i will often times push way beyond traditional mastering. If they give you a great mix, and are just expecting minimal tweaks, that final 5% to polish things off, then maybe be more conservative.

You can still be conservative enough with m/s stuff to where its not overbearing or noticeable.

 

The more time passes, the more I realize It's all about communication. I've had some "what did you even do" kind of questions in the past for being too subtle.

 

For me the best mastering work is not about how much processing is made but the knowledge that every movement is done to deliver consumer grade music. You can throw 2 soothes, m/s eq, compression, or only use a limiter and a dither, i don't really care about that. I do care about the intention of the song; the mastering engineer that can make it consumer ready while retaining the performance character is my hero. The mastering engineer that changes the intention of the record to fit a standard (his standard, for instance) or to simply change things that are only a matter of taste, this person is my nightmare. Keep your expensive mastering outboard gear on your pocket if the purpose of it is changing the vibe of my song.