Fabfilter Pro -Q3 or alternative?

Discussion in 'Mixing and Mastering' started by Psyflight, Jun 7, 2022.

Tags:
  1. tzzsmk

    tzzsmk Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2016
    Messages:
    3,952
    Likes Received:
    2,482
    Location:
    Heart of Europe
    impulse response is domain of time, no EQ can do that
     
  2. Sinus Well

    Sinus Well Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2019
    Messages:
    2,143
    Likes Received:
    1,650
    Location:
    Sanatorium
    Each filter generates an impulse response. That's the nature of a filter.
     
    Last edited: Sep 6, 2022
    • Interesting Interesting x 1
    • List
  3. tzzsmk

    tzzsmk Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2016
    Messages:
    3,952
    Likes Received:
    2,482
    Location:
    Heart of Europe
    maybe I'm messing things up, but I always considered IR as "package" of filters throughout time :invision:

    [​IMG]
     
  4. Sinus Well

    Sinus Well Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2019
    Messages:
    2,143
    Likes Received:
    1,650
    Location:
    Sanatorium
    Take an impulse with the length of exactly one sample, apply a filter of your choice to it, and render the result. Then look at the result and marvel at the filter's impulse response.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Useful Useful x 1
    • List
  5. VSKZ

    VSKZ Producer

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2021
    Messages:
    301
    Likes Received:
    107
    It depends, are you dissatisfied with the EQ you are using now and what do you want it to do better?
    I use Ableton EQ8 for basic stuff, ProQ3 for more surgical stuff and Pulsar Massive for “color”
     
  6. Auxiee

    Auxiee Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2022
    Messages:
    68
    Likes Received:
    19
    I have both , if you were to keep the better one , which?
     
  7. droplet

    droplet Rock Star

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2020
    Messages:
    989
    Likes Received:
    451
    Location:
    up up and away
    probably FF.
     
Loading...
Loading...