Everything You Know About 'Carving Space' with EQ is wrong? Maybe!

Discussion in 'Mixing and Mastering' started by Cardamom, Dec 13, 2022.

  1. Cardamom

    Cardamom Platinum Record

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2015
    Messages:
    204
    Likes Received:
    231


    Thoughts? His audio examples seem to legitimize his position on the issue.
     
  2.  
  3. clone

    clone Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2021
    Messages:
    6,149
    Likes Received:
    2,631
    Clickbait. Nothing he says is all that "controversial", but he says very little at all. It starts to fall apart once you being adding any additional fx. That's a recipe for mud.
     
    Last edited: Dec 13, 2022
    • Agree Agree x 3
    • Like Like x 2
    • List
  4. Demloc

    Demloc Platinum Record

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2020
    Messages:
    232
    Likes Received:
    199
    Incompatible with loud/bass based genres.
     
  5. mk_96

    mk_96 Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2020
    Messages:
    1,027
    Likes Received:
    696
    Location:
    Your heart
    I like the point he makes on people following ideas instead of listening. The problem is, these vids will incite some of that too, some people will boost kick and bass and be confused when one specific note sticks out like hell.

    Production plays a major role on how all those work, if you take into account overlaping or low-mid quality before mixing of course you can do whatever you want, but in reality that's not always the case, same for high/lowpassing stuff or scooping the mids.

    So yeah, this is schrondinger's advice, it's great and sucks at the same time until you put it against a real thing, then rinse and repeat.
     
  6. clone

    clone Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2021
    Messages:
    6,149
    Likes Received:
    2,631
    "use your ears. just look at these numbers to prove it."

    "back when I was intermediate"... was the end of it for me.
     
  7. No Avenger

    No Avenger Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2017
    Messages:
    8,974
    Likes Received:
    6,186
    Location:
    Europe
    I'm not that into YT vids for mixing but I've never carved out any (low) freqs this way. But you need to take care, aka listen, that it doesn't cause problems, that's for sure.

    That's what came to my mind too.
     
  8. clone

    clone Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2021
    Messages:
    6,149
    Likes Received:
    2,631
    my default Logic EQ when I open it is set to cutoff below 30hz as soon as I open one. with the attenuation set to about -48 so some stuff will still go below 30, but definitely not 20. I might alter this later, but I'd rather do this than forget to.

    the reason why I don't see him making some "point" controversial or not, is that people do not do subtractive EQ in front of compression for no reason. That simple eq change does not exist in a vacuum (free from dynamics). And this influencer guy talking about more than bass, contrary to the title of his video; is largely not good info to present to someone.
     
  9. madbuzzin

    madbuzzin Platinum Record

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2021
    Messages:
    482
    Likes Received:
    199
    Arent there a whole class of plugins dedicated to dipping out resonant frequencies? the hell is this guy talking about? My general rule I follow is if dip somewhere, make up the difference somewhere else. Ive been messing with doing shelves and crossing them at what I hear as a sweet spot and then mixing from there... Idk what it is but it sounds different
     
  10. Lois Lane

    Lois Lane Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2019
    Messages:
    4,193
    Likes Received:
    4,181
    Location:
    Somewhere Over The Rainbow
    Isn't he a "Youtube mixer" too? Good thing he's advanced though or else I might NOT listen to him and so NOT overlap the low frequency spectrum of a mix and just plain ruin everything. A godSEND is he to rescue, to guide with sage advice.
     
Loading...
Loading...