defragmentation (+ optimization) impact on samples libraries

Discussion in 'PC' started by Musicalista, Apr 17, 2015.

  1. Musicalista

    Musicalista Newbie

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2015
    Messages:
    17
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Messina, IT
    Good morning everybody, I was wondering if the defragmentation (+ optimization) of the HDD may have any bad consequence to our sample sound libraries.
    I mean, defragmentation should just move files but what about the optimization function? I hope it didn't compress the sound files making them lose quality. I don't know if you got what I meant to say.
    I've been using IOBIT Smart Defrag v3.4 and Auslogic DiskDefrag v5.1

    Thanks for any reply,
    regards
     
  2.  
  3. As you said, defragmentation moves files to be more "accessible" for your HD...
    Maybe you can enjoy a lil' speed up while loading the sample. *yes*

    On the other front i strongly suggest you to NOT compress your library folders because, in my personal experience, compressed file (for compressed i mean the "blue" named file in Windows) may slow down the performances of the software, especially with Kontakt and all the Native Instruments stuff. I always see this kind of compression as a last resort to be used when you are runnin' really low on space while waitin' for a new hard disk.

    By the way, no quality will be loss in either cases.
     
  4. Musicalista

    Musicalista Newbie

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2015
    Messages:
    17
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Messina, IT
    So defragmentation moves files to be more accessible and do the optimization do the exact same thing?

    Are you talking about Kontakt compress or what?
     
  5. MozartEstLa

    MozartEstLa Platinum Record

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2014
    Messages:
    645
    Likes Received:
    283
    Location:
    France
    I understand it's disk compression (blue files and folders from Windows Explorer, as explained above), not NCW samples compression.
     
  6. Yep.. You get the point! :wink:
     
  7. Rhodes

    Rhodes Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2015
    Messages:
    928
    Likes Received:
    558
    Just defrag Your drives whenever You put something new on them, and everything should run "much" faster... it takes a minute or less if You do it regularly.
    Disk keeper is a good utility to use for the job :wink:
     
  8. nymusic1

    nymusic1 Newbie

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2014
    Messages:
    5
    Likes Received:
    0
    If possible keep sample libraries on a dedicated drive separate from the DAW audio files, or use a partition for the samples. Samples are only being read so they never get fragmented, it is my understanding that you can actually get worse performance if you defrag samples because of the way it rearranges the samples. I defrag my C drive and audio drive but never defrag my sample drive, there is no benefit so you'll just be shortening the life of your hard drive if you do.
     
  9. SineWave

    SineWave Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2011
    Messages:
    4,429
    Likes Received:
    3,568
    Location:
    Where the sun doesn't shine.
    Actually, if you keep your hard drives defragmented, you're prolonging their lifespan, as they don't need to work that hard.
     
  10. Musicalista

    Musicalista Newbie

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2015
    Messages:
    17
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Messina, IT
    Yea but still I'm not sure on what's the difference between defrag and defrag + optimize.

    I think I expressed myself badly in the first post, this was what I wanted to say...
    as you can see there are 2 options for defragmenting:

    http://s28.postimg.org/mxxonnw19/img.png

    so since the defrag only moves files to be more accessible for the HDD, I'm not sure on the defrag + optimize, I hope it didn't compress the file sizes of my libraries with the result of a loss in sound quality :dancing:
     
  11. nymusic1

    nymusic1 Newbie

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2014
    Messages:
    5
    Likes Received:
    0
    If your samples are on a dedicated hard drive it will never need to be defragmented, so in this example defragmenting would actually reduce the life of the drive.
     
  12. nymusic1

    nymusic1 Newbie

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2014
    Messages:
    5
    Likes Received:
    0
    Bottom line (in my opinion) Keep samples on separate drive (or at least a separate partition) and never defrag them. This was recommended to me by more than one sample developer including fxpansion when I asked them, also the guy from Platinum Samples said the exact same thing.
     
  13. Evorax

    Evorax Rock Star

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2013
    Messages:
    1,764
    Likes Received:
    320
    Location:
    Bowerstone Castle
    There's everything you want to find out about "Defrag + Optimize" option in the program's manual.

    Check it out here, page 38 : http://www.auslogics.com/en/software/disk-defrag-pro/manual/?source=disk-defrag-pro&registered=true
     
  14. junh1024

    junh1024 Rock Star

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2011
    Messages:
    1,396
    Likes Received:
    433
    Defrag never loses quality. Unless the defrag app is badly written (ie, doesn't make a copy as it defrgs) or your cache isn't performing its job, and you switch off the HD while it's defragging. In which case you're losing content as well.

    NCW compression should be a lossless compression scheme. Somewhat like WV/FLAC. Use it if you want.

    Using filesystem compression may speed things up if the operations are IO-bound. https://www.citusdata.com/blog/64-zfs-compression

    But if your data goes corrupt after you enable compression, your data is more toast than if you didn't.
     
  15. Willum

    Willum Rock Star

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2011
    Messages:
    756
    Likes Received:
    441
    I dont know if anyone is defragging their ssd's but its not really required from wwin7 and up. Here's a blog page that explains why, http://www.hanselman.com/blog/therealandcompletestorydoeswindowsdefragmentyourssd.aspx
     
  16. MNDSTRM

    MNDSTRM Platinum Record

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2011
    Messages:
    629
    Likes Received:
    275
    Location:
    Toronto
    Defrag puts parts of the same files close to each other, optimize puts the files that are most used in an easier to access area.

    Don't ever defrag SSDs, they have have a write life cycle and you'll just be wasting them. plus fragmentation is good for them because most used files will wear the entire drive evenly.
     
  17. Pipotron3000

    Pipotron3000 Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2013
    Messages:
    1,228
    Likes Received:
    616
    About Kontakt, "batch resave" per library may bring more results than defrag ;)
    Don't expect something obvious with defrag.
    I stopped using defrag years ago with the last mechanical disks.
    Too much hassle for almost nothing. And continuous stress put on drive when doing defrag.

    If you want a real result, SSD is the way. After that, RAID (easy software RAID 0 or 1 can be done with Windows and Linux). After, hybrid disk (flash+mechanical).
     
  18. fiction

    fiction Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    1,912
    Likes Received:
    700
    Yep, that's exactly my experience too. A resaved Kontakt program rarely takes more than one second to load.
    Might be a good idea to put sample libs to an external USB3 SSD drive so you can use the library on different machines and improve performance too.
     
  19. Musicalista

    Musicalista Newbie

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2015
    Messages:
    17
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Messina, IT
    Thanks all, even if I never asked about Kontakt compress :wink:
     
  20. studio5599

    studio5599 Producer

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2011
    Messages:
    987
    Likes Received:
    91
    Do Not Defrag your HD at all especially if using for studio recording ! It does Compress your files moves your files around and compresses them, NEVER DEFRAG A STUDIO PC BAD MOVE SERIOUSLY

    also another thing if you format your Hd a lot? another mistake! this takes away sectors,creates a mirror as your hd space gets smaller and eventually it destroys your Hd array,cycles every time you format! Keep it limited to format
     
  21. HalleBnLilSis

    HalleBnLilSis Member

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2013
    Messages:
    47
    Likes Received:
    9
    Greetz Friend,

    The best state of any Hardrive and/or Hardrive Partition is one in as good a state of defragmentation as possible. To Get This, We use Smart Defrag which is FREE.

    http://www.iobit.com/iobitsmartdefrag.html

    It is an excellent defrag app considering it's free. Most Free Defrag App do not defrag one of the most important Files in an OS, the MFT (Master File Table) file which can slow down your system when it becomes defragmented. Smart Defrag does.

    It has a very USER Friendly Interface az well.

    OBTW: Don't bother with their Security Products, They S U C K. :bleh:

    Hope this helps. *yes* :bow:
     
Loading...
Similar Threads - defragmentation optimization) impact Forum Date
PSPAudioware - plugins that freeze (bad optimization) Software Dec 30, 2015
Loading...