Hello
Before I start, I apologize that this post may not be relevant to this section

i have cubase pro 13 legit version and im using it in macOS
i want to know can i install spectralayer , dorico V.R or u2b version and use it along my legit cubase ?
it's an question for me , because v.r patched license files in macOS
please help !

 

I think you cannot use both cracked softwares along legit license of cubase

 

I dont know , anybody can help me ?

 

Licence Engine file patched by V.R
And you'll not can to use cubase legit without SIP Enabled , Becuase Cracked working only if SIP Disabled completely ,
if you want to use Cracked Softwares , You should use Cubase Pro 13 V.R and
If you replace patched file you're cubase license will be destroyed

 

no reason to run legit vs k'd steiny stuff anymore at all. becomes too much of a headache to deal with. just run V.R. ver's of ALL steiny apps, run the unlocker, and PRESTO! All authorized, and then you can move on to more creative endeavors.

 

As he said, he uses the legal version of Cubis
Well like me, in your opinion, is it reasonable to switch to the cracked version?
It doesn't make sense, because there is a lack of stability in the software, and this person definitely spent money, maybe the cracked version contain bugs.
Of course
This is not the case in Windows, both vr and r2r crack work properly without any problem!
As far as I know, VR only patches the license in Windows
But I don't know about Mac

Well, with this account, the user who created this post should give a definitive opinion
But I want to tell you your opinion about the stability of cubase in the k'd version, that it is possible not to prepare a legal version and to use the cracked version permanently and as the main program?
I only work with cubase
Because of these statements that the cracked version is not stable, I did not go to the Mac version

 

Last edited: Sep 29, 2024

Reports on the sissite are that there are Cubase 13 (earlier versions) that work OK for the Intel apple devices. The apple M devices seem to be another story. I am not interested in apple enough to check for problems on the official steiny forums on cubases' apple M side, but it would be my guess if there are problems reported with the apple M devices and cubase, it's more likely that the problems are stemmed from the OEM and not the K's. Granted there are such things as "bad K's" and there may be some of that playing in here for the apple side - no idea. But, the apple side always seems to have more hurdles to overcome when getting K'd stuff in general to run properly given all the roadblocks thrown into the path by none other than apple itself. Almost to the point of it being a self defeating endeavor.

For cubase, a disparaging chasm seems to exist between the Windows side, and the apple M side when it comes to proper operations. I was originally speaking in terms of the windows side as one who has run the "legit" stuff (a long time ago) as opposed to the K'd versions. After experiencing both sides of that coin firsthand it finally becomes a very simple decision about which version (K'd vs "legit") to run. The K'd versions always seem to load a little faster, render a little quicker, and generally run a little smoother than the "legit" versions, IMO. With all production hampering binary checks, miscellaneous garbage, and license b.s. removed, the K'd version is like a breath of fresh air in comparison for the user.

 

Last edited: Sep 29, 2024

So , K'd version working like legit version on both OP