@Stevie Dude No, the guy/girl is only just about to hookup the MIDI cable in the back of it :D

 

@Stevie Dude just add "backwards" before "synth". They'll null the shit out of it

 

I was asking myself the same thing. I managed to remove the Watermark with Photoshop's Clone stamp tool, but I just don't feel comfortable using the image as a cover. My guess is that it also contains some DRM shit/ID, whatever.

 

Last edited: Apr 13, 2023

May be an invitation..

 

it's a really long prompt and took around 3 minutes for it to come out with this. after 10 attempts.





inspired by this :

 

Maybe this happend in this picture, because i added the word abstract.

 

It's concerning to see these results to say the least. I would hope creative people would be the most vocal about the dangers of AI. To me it's the death of art, there's nothing interesting about something AI created.
But I am in the minority apparently. It's only a matter of time before it takes over music too. Will be a horribly sad day when an AI artist wins a Grammy.
Man and machine are becoming one, there's no going back now.

 

Are there any similar Ai creators but for video you can recommend? I just need something to make super simple (or complex if it can) shapes and colors movements for background in demo music videos.. could be anything really. Anything is better than just a boring blank static image on screen. Or maybe a program that can do some Ai magic with videos I shoot with my phone? Preferably not an Adobe product

 

this kind of fear already existed the moment someone invented the electric guitar, 20 years after that it happens again when synthesizers were invented, drum machine, and so on. I see nothing worth mentioning happens and people still make music and winning grammy like usual.

 

Google "video wallpaper" (that's the more official term instead of background). You'll get results that might head you in the right direction

 

Humans are welcome to do better. If they do, art isn't dead. If they can't, art isn't dead, since apparently it didn't exist.

 

Thanks. Looking through the search results im finding many static wallpapers, then some paid live wallpapers, others I would guess likely get used a lot.

Are there no programs (like Affinity Designer - but for video) that incorporate AI to create unique video wallpapers? Perhaps something like 'Blackmagic Design DaVinci Resolve Studio ? or Vegas? I never tried these so looking for suggestions.

 

I haven't seen anything like that yet. The video would be ~30 images per second and AI takes some time just to make one image.

 

It begs the question "did James Cameron do Roger Dean better than Roger Dean?" If so does Roger still exist? I hope so. A few signed prints are my retirement fund.

 

What would happen is they would just credit the song to an established artist hiding the AI element.

 

Guitars don't play themselves, synths as well, and anyone worth their salt programs a drum machine to reflect changes to reflect emotion in a song. Musicians play their instruments and so use their built upon experience infused with native creativity to make artful music. To me using a machine to do the actual work in the process of actual writing in the long term will certainly dumb down the population as a whole who wish wish to express themselves since they will have no ground knowledge and can never internally learn from the happy mistakes that it takes to be an actual artist, none of the hard work and calluses built up over time that are earned from thinking and executing actions based on their deep seeded emotions and what wells up and is directed at them from the aethers. It's nice not to have to slice through some animals intestines, cure them, let them dry to use them as strings for my guitars, but rather let Señor D'Addario make a zillion high quality packages of jangly metal that I can buy in a store or order online. I am still playing the instrument unlike someone prompting a software program to blaze like Jimi during a 16 bar lead and then come back to the chorus with "if Ron Carter played guitar, do something like that". I believe there to be a monumental difference between doing and out sourcing by letting something removed of the true human experience be the slave of interesting ideas. If one feels the need to sit it out but take credit somehow with the machine's outcome, whatever, but there will be consequences generations down the line. Time flies and before you know it humans will literally be rendered fairly useless. One thing is creating actual art and the other is basically near mindless and mimicking soulless entertainment.

 

I've realized over time that one of the reasons I enjoy the faults of past technology (film grain, old samplers, clunky physical mediums, old CGI that took solid weeks to render, etc) is that they still exude human desire, frailty, and ingenuity...

Whereas now, the comparatively seamless technology of today and tomorrow have begun to exceed and dominate us in more clever ways. And in the arts, of all things! Well, in the case of Bing Image Creator, it isn't quite seamless at all but rather quite ugly looking, still.

One thing that concerns me the most is how we will soon be unable to distinguish between an actual image (or voice or video recording) of a living person, place or thing vs the AI generated version. I already catch myself having weird disassociative moments where I have to double check if an image is 'real' or not. Anything in the 'uncanny valley' ought to have gasoline poured on it and incinerated as far as I'm concerned.

Just think what this will do to mass media and propaganda? When nobody knows whether an event actually occurred but there is a flawless digital capture of it, with no discernible way to tell it from reality or not. This alone is a good enough reason to fight against these advancements. But of course, it would be a pointless effort. As @damian9 said, there is no going back now.

There are many more things to say about all of this...

 

I think there are a lot of that kind of "music" these days. I mean yes, it was made by human but we as music maker, we all know the greatest, the hardest shit ever is to transfer all you have to say, what you feel, in the form of art, in this case, music that actually delivers the message with great accuracy. Just because the makers feel it, doesn't mean it's there in their art work because the understanding and skills aren't there yet. Worse, often because lack of self-awareness to admit that the "problem" is there at the first place that leads to not wanting to improve the situation.

If, it is a big if AI manages to mimic all the techniques and manage to come out with something that has everything, call it fake expression or fake feelings but it actually made the receiving end get all the similar experience as if they are listening to great real human-made music. How are we suppose to objectively rate that ? Are we sticking with the shitty music made by clueless human or the great AI music, while still being fair to everyone ?