a.i should not exists

 

Stories, songs, rituals, clay tablets, papyrus scrolls, manuscripts, books, pamphlets, journals, newspapers, radio, television, documentaries, search engines, online encyclopedias, databases, intelligent assistants, generative AI, ...

So what?

Where does our individual knowledge come from? Only from our own experience? Hardly. Are we only allowed to pass on as our knowledge what we have actually experienced ourselves? Hardly. But if we are allowed to pass on second-hand knowledge, which sources are permitted and which are prohibited? Who shall determine how we may acquire and pass on our knowledge? Isn't knowledge such a valuable commodity that the question of its origin is actually meaningless?

The real danger to humanity is not knowledge, but is ignorance.

(written without the use of AI)

 

Part of the issue is that there was a time when people understood exactly what fact was versus sensationalism, and a tool versus complete reliance. So they would go to an Encyclopedia or University document, or authorised factual document to find out.
While they still exist, those documents even though accurate, cannot and will never update as fast as the developers work on A.I.

As a small example hypothetically - If you wanted to know what happened with a remote volcanic eruption in a tiny town that happened yesterday, you have very few options but to rely on media or A.I. The Encyclopedias and factual documents will never keep up unfortunately. If someone asked the thread question regarding do we have our priorities in order? Then I would possibly consider saying no we do not.

 

Spoiler: !!!WARNING!!!

IF Y'ALL DONT STOP PICKIN ON ME, IM FINNA TELL ME MUM ON YOOS!

 

I'm not quite so sure about that even if we are talking current events and encyclopedias. People have been fed propaganda forever to sway their minds to a particular ideology, usually through fear "of the other" to instill hate and foment anger, usually in the favor of a top 1% group of the wealthy.