Yep, looks and sounds convincing. :like:
I have to agree with the counterpart, triplets and end part, but starts very good, good sounds, clear, has a nice impact. :like:
No, I could've done this myself if I'd seen this as necessary. Have you tried https://www.deepl.com/translator?
That was mean, but funny. [img]
No need to rush. Sure, why not?
Yep. It's not about +/- 0,1dB. What I couldn't match was the sound. Feel free to not stick exactly to my pic, no prob. Just try if you can match...
Where? I couldn't find one and none of his posts are edited. Other than that, please all, stop the guesswork about what a team will do or not.
Not better, just an addition because sadly, PD doesn't tell the whole story either.
Nice offer. I had difficulties to reproduce this setting with EQuick. Can you match this sound-wise with Equilibrium? [img]
Technically correct, soundwise it's meant to be one.
Mh, since my favourite algo optos are CL 1B, TLA100 (opto style) and bx_opto and tubes are Pulsar Mu, Neold and True Dynamics, I think I must be...
And therefore an extremely bad compressor. [img]
License, I was talking about the license.
I just tried and can't confirm. Used it on drums, bass, even Classical music with at least 14dB GR, all five compressors for 'normal', stereo and...
You need to put both kind of licenses on different drives. E.g. 'demos' from sister on internal HD, official on USB.
Ah, you haven't seen the pic: [IMG] On the other hand, I see no reason not to run a synth bass through it.
Nope, Ampeg is for basses.
Interesting composition, HH in the chill part is too distracting and I prefer the power part. :winker: :metal:
:woot: [img]
Since LUFS is a negative value, when you say you want to bring down the LUFS, are talking about -10LUFS down to e. g. -14LUFS? And when you say...
Separate names with a comma.