whatever you do...your first step should be to change your OS to either XP or 7....and dump vista in a dark deep well!
if you downsample below 44.1 yes you will hear a difference...if you upsample from 44khz to above, there will be no difference in sound for you as...
I come across you post after having written mine but that's about it! *yes*
I agree that protools is no longer that superior nowadays ...and it's a standard in pro studios chiefly because old habits die hard, however I...
you forget to mention the most important...THEY HAVE THE HARDWARE THAT COMES WITH IT! pro tools isnt just a sotfware...
that's for sure lol, how would you get something that is not there in the beginning...the same goes with instruments... if you miss some...
yeah i understand what you mean but in this case they are all the same...because the quality doesnt depend on the DAW but on the AD/DA converters...
interesting, thanks
yep that's quite true, the way the audio engine handles panning is different, especially in the center, there are apparently different...
I really like cubase but i'm left perplexed by Steinberg...being the inventor of VSTs I wonder "how come?", ...the bridge in cubase is one of the...
well first what do you mean by record?...record midi instruments or having mics set up like for a sax, bass or guitar.... anyway, what's so...
ok if you talk about sonar 7 or 8 I agree.... but X1 is a different story seriously...still has flaws and problems...but i can dig it *yes* the...
what version of sonar did you try??? cuz I'm a (VERY) long time cubase user who now uses Sonar x1B x64 and it's very very stable... actually i...
started with cubase for windows in the early 90's and kept using cubase as my main DAW up to version 5... (trying all the others to see if there...
Separate names with a comma.
