It's the strongest indicator for a bad listening environment. I never have ear fatigue.
By being able to work with it on a repetitive basis. That's the only technically senseful definition. Everything else is gossip.
Due to your analysis - the satirical ones.
It's not a technology, it's just a gimmick that only single purpose really is to prevent someone from being able to work on a repetitive basis.
An objectively better listening environment. Well tuned Iem's can work wonders here.
Surely not. It's a business to business related company. :yes:
With only 60+ billion revenue 2023.
Yes. Yes. :yes: It was still a thing 10-15 years ago but at least since the UAD Apollo x16 definetely not anymore at all.
NovoNotes 3DX Melda MStereoSpread AconDigital Verberate 2 In this order on every single mono track in every song.
"True" is a theory that is not falsifiable. The only theory that is not falsifiable per definition is the fundamental of science - critical...
And whoops, the Hi-Hat is gone. :hahaha:
One could change it to "linking to warez sites is not allowed".
Understanding audio fundamentals helps here.
So you first want to use ai tools, and then fix the outcome? :unsure:
Yeah. That's fine. This is basically what "Sinus Well" said. There is indeed a very objective target about loudness, it just does not have...
The high pitched precussion is too quite. And it's probably also not a good sample. It should have more sustain.
Yes, that's a very important topic. But I just make it short: I do have an extremely flat response and close to 0 reverb. And I tell you...
Because that's what's happening if someone thinks it should sound like this, and then an other guy thinks afterwards it should sound like that....
There are some ai solver, but mostly they cost.
Pretty good decision. The original has so much distortion that it doesn't even matter how bad it would be designed. :hahaha: So the advantage...
Separate names with a comma.
