Actually that could be a great research angle. I'm pretty sure it's possible to discover the objectives reasons between this irrational dichotomy...
Awesome post indeed. He makes some solid point in favor of objectivism.... Lol, it reminds me of my university years (huamn science, sociology...
I agree with that too. Which is also why I rely less on Sam lately. Transparency is good cause it's reliable to build upon. No way to control...
Wow. Didn't think we'll get there so quick. Then we agree. I never talked about better, or worst, just owned that I hear a difference between...
It has been done. In those specific conditions (one sample, no panning, no volume variation, no fxs) it confirms the theory, null test passes. In...
Pretty aware of most of those theorical points. The theory saying all daws "sound the same" doesn't stand the test of practice at all. And indeed...
BTW. Last word : theories in "science" are just words on a piece of papers if you can't back them in reality through experimentation. Any one...
TL;DR :rofl:
TL;DR . No this is dumb and arrogant. Learn how to have a conversation without acting like a damn child. Cheers. :wink:
You can't hear the difference ? Well yep. Change hobby. Become a scientist. :wink:
Yep one of the first daw ever created with Cubase. Very popular in Europe. Do kids use it ? Who knows ? Do kids work in studios ? Phase issues are...
I don't know wtf you're talking about. He didn't use sam stock eqs in his example. And by default the stock eqs in samplitude (yeah those linear...
Yeah I've got to test it too. Ara 2 isn't even implemented yet apparently. Sucks.
Yeah regarding samplitude, the differences with other daws, even if using the same plugs....clear as a sunny day. I had previously posted an...
Wow, that's a very small update. Very happy for the automation lanes, I've been bi...ng about it for while....But wow, this is a small update. Is...
Yep but those are just consequences though. United or not if you have the global structure above that inherently generates catastrophic...
That's an interesting point. True I was mostly refering to material determinism in a world where materialism has never been front and center. But...
Yeah I got it. It's an interesting epistemological debate. I humbly disagree with him. I think human sciences will never get their Galillean...
Well Chomsky was right but we have moved forward since then. We know mostly in modern societies what determinism and economic and social...
But then again physics (ie gravity), biology (ie eating and drinking, maybe even breathing ? don't know maybe tha became optional), sociology...
Separate names with a comma.
