Yes, I can. Every audio professional should ask himself one very important question at a time. "What are the fundamental audio quality...
[MEDIA]
Greyson Nekrutman
Yes, a lot of those "pros" are emberassing. :yes: And I would write exactly this in response to him.
Oh, believe me, if you'd make an own thread for this, I can assure you there will be people who suggest at least a thousand things more to prove...
I don't think it's snake oil, but I think it does not do anything good. What special shall it do anyways? :dunno:
This is absolutely amazing. Recently I thought about something exactly like this. An automatic multiband phase corrector. I really believe this...
It's not the same. A waveform, as the name states, consists of waves. If you zoom way in you'll see. Let's take many sinus waves in one long...
No, I agree with that everything above the threshold in the Waveform at a specified time gets reduced which is every frequency in this waveform at...
Dude... The waveform gets reduced in this part where it goes above the threshold and therefore every frequency that this waveform contains get's...
You can use Stereo Tool. This makes everything very dense. But since every broadcast station uses those kind of tools it doesn't make sense...
Because there are a lot of people out there that do not know how to use a volume knob, not to mention knowing what the difference between dynamics...
Yes, you do not need mono. You also can simply reduce the width to a certain degree. Take a look at https://www.voxengo.com/product/correlometer/...
Yes, sure. Very complicated. :winker:
Then you need to lower the bass volume again. :dunno: But the bass up to 250Hz is definetely weak. S1 is a very good tool. Try applying...
Still my favourite. :bleh: [MEDIA]
https://my.mail.ru/mail/gosteva.00/video/_myvideo/1.html https://ok.ru/video/34260388531
I thought it is a sampler. [IMG]
Ah, I understand. Thank you. :shalom:
Thank you. :shalom:
Separate names with a comma.
