drummer here, I love your idea! if you manage to isolate different "instruments" (using EQ, gates, AI whatever...), you can very easily replace...
some years back it was possible to install some older MacOS version and get the versions of AppStore apps "latest" compatible with that older...
no, that's the beauty of being Apple customer, you're not allowed to do what you want :hahaha:
oh I see, I still got older rig of i7-3770K with 16GB ram running fine, but indeed it's an aging platform, lack of NVME boot support being one of...
M4 Mac Mini ($600) is boring, laughable 256GB storage and 16GB shared memory, M4 Pro Mac Mini is interesting but still laughably tiny storage and...
there is a medical evidence human eyes get stessed "unevenly" when having certain frequently viewed elements on either edge of the viewport,...
only "reliable" method being (paid) Parallels that can virtualize Windows for ARM for which no plugins really exist, so it will emulate x86...
Mac Studio M4 is supposed to release somewhere in Q2 2025, so I would wait, even right now, Mac Mini M4 Pro already outperforms current Mac Studio...
that's true, but once you factor in some pair of decent ergo arms, price difference gets minimized :invision:
M4 Max MacBook Pro would make a noticeable difference in every way you can imagine (while retaining Thunderbolt support) but I'm not sure if...
maybe the way you look at it, but frankly no bezels are better than any bezels, hence why ultrawide screens are slowly gaining popularity :winker:
I get 50Mbit/s sometimes (free user), I guess it really depends on what time and what history your IP/connection has :chilling:
for me, Reaper has wide range to choose from, and easily accessible - either Alt+drag items, or draw stretch markers and take pitch envelopes :yes:
but that's frankly my point, you could have gotten 27" 2560x1440 and have exact same "screen estate" result, literally :disco:
I'm afraid it's not possible actually, in a similar way nearfield speakers cannot provide as wide dynamic range as midfield speakers, because of...
so you're genuinely enjoying staring at two bezels in the middle of your view? for me it's compromise I can't stand :no:
oH fUcK iT'S sO biG :rofl:
indeed, before 14" was 1024x768, I've been there, so what? just pointing out acceptable DPI/PPI had been settled on long time ago, only...
maybe in few more years, some advanced comfortable VR glasses will solve all that, not blocking the speakers at all :invision:
people used 2 17" 1280x1024 monitors, basically equal to one 2560x1080 ultrawide, then 2 21" 1920x1080 monitors, basically equal to one 3840x1080...
Separate names with a comma.
