No need for “listening comparisons.” It's maths.
The difference is file size. 144dB is not better quality than 96dB dynamic range. It's just a matter of necessity. What does your project require?...
That's just accepting what you get from the artist in exchange for some dollars... And I totally understand that. I've done that as well. I think...
Internal processing is either 32 or 64 bit. I understand that. A single audio sample for reuse later down the track, does not require 192, 144,...
Lol! "Dither up?" It doesn't even make sense!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I need a friend...
Aside from "noise floor" which I already perfectly understand, please help me to understand why you require higher bit depths.
“Cumulative.” Hmmm. That might make sense if there was a problem to begin with. Can you please point out where the problem is that accumulates?
----removed----
Keep your mixdown/bounce at 24/48! Problem solved!
You're all good, mate! No problem at all :) … Look at my Avatar… I thought, together, we could dump all over JW's and Aliens, lol. Maybe that's...
I was a JW for the first 6 years of my life. Many of my family members (who I don't speak to) still are.
Find the right thread, and I'm right there with you :-P
I'm not trying to convince you of anything. Do you want me to shut-up? I'm just sharing information in an appropriate thread. Who the hell knows,...
Potentially the most respected man in audio engineering, Dan Worrall - "Samplerates: the higher the better, right?": [MEDIA]
I'm just dropping a thought here… I'm thinking out loud… This comment is not meaningful in any way at all… Rupert Neve was interviewed by Dave...
All of your needs are most certainly covered with those specs! The only thing now is that your poor computer has to store gigabytes of useless...
Oh, sorry. My bad.
Lol, that's how you fly an umbrella.
I didn't mention grammar :-) I mentioned words.
No way, mate. Look it up.
Separate names with a comma.
