Apple dropping Rosetta 2 after Tahoe — what does this mean for our x86 VST libraries?

Discussion in 'Mac / Hackintosh' started by dn4p, Feb 19, 2026 at 10:29 PM.

  1. dn4p

    dn4p Newbie

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2025
    Messages:
    2
    Likes Received:
    0
    Apple is expected to end Rosetta 2 support after macOS Tahoe. A huge chunk of the plugin ecosystem still relies on Rosetta to run inside our DAWs, and once that translation layer is gone, those plugins are simply dead on any newer OS.

    So what do we actually do here? Is the plan just to stay on Tahoe forever and hope for the best?

    Would love to know how people are thinking about it.
     
  2.  
  3. clone

    clone Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2021
    Messages:
    10,053
    Likes Received:
    4,347
    I wouldn't worry about it 1 bit. What are these Intel plugins you can't replace with either an ARM version, or a different plugin?

    Obviously that will be almost entirely [k]d stuff, or abandonware. You could leave the machine you have on Tahoe or even older MacOS.
    You could buy a desk big enough to hold a second Mini that can still use Rosetta2 and an ethernet cable. You could Run Parallels Desktop or other VM for just intel plugins.

    The easy answer and one I would plan on would be to just go all ARM plugins and not run anything via Rosetta2. Many people have already done that.
     
  4. grrarrrgh

    grrarrrgh Kapellmeister

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2024
    Messages:
    369
    Likes Received:
    42
    I would have to go through my system and see if there’s anything I would have an update for that’s compatible with Apple silicon and if there’s anything not compatible, but it might just be “if it’s not 64 bit it’s not going past Tahoe” and I probably have everything as a universal binary (unfattened but would still have universal installation)… anything missing the jump beyond is probably just staying on windows for me
     
  5. clone

    clone Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2021
    Messages:
    10,053
    Likes Received:
    4,347
    MacOS 26 is Tahoe. 27 will be next year and still have Rosetta2. So 28 will be the first version with limited Rosetta2 support.
    Here: https://support.apple.com/en-us/102527

    So two operating systems from now you will have to "worry about it" or make some plans. But what programs are you going to be running 2 years from now which have still not been updated to ARM versions? They will be from basically dead developers, or those plugins you do not have new updates to because they are cracked. If something like that is a problem, you may have to actually buy some stuff that you will have been using as Intel plugins for another 2 years more. That is pushing "try before buy" a little far. If there are new versions, maybe some Team will make a ARM release of them.

    And that is the doom and gloom scenario. A more likely one is you will either not even use Intel plugins or you will just figure out some other way to run your DAW completely Native-only. This will ultimately be a complete non-issue.
     
  6. shinyzen

    shinyzen Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2023
    Messages:
    1,482
    Likes Received:
    894
    Ive pretty much switched to only ARM, but there are still quite a few older plugins that only run as AU that i use here and there. As far as Im aware, nobody has incorporated hosting rosetta plugins in a plugin host, like bluecat, ddmf etc. I havent looked in a while, so could be wrong. If nobody has, I wonder if its possible. hmmmmm... going to look into it more.
     
  7. Dan Fuerth

    Dan Fuerth Producer

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2017
    Messages:
    179
    Likes Received:
    108
    And here I am running ( on Windows 11 customized edition)
    VSTi's and VST's from 2001 and up lol

    Apple has been doing this for years trying to shake off the Pro users with these changes. Remember Apple is a CELL PHONE and consumer gadgets company now, they want to move away form the Pro industry, it's time for people to understand that. This has been going on for many years the Shake, Logic and many other tools saga should of been a clear sign of where Apple was headed.
     
    Last edited: Feb 20, 2026 at 4:14 AM
    • Dislike Dislike x 2
    • Love it! Love it! x 1
    • List
  8. clone

    clone Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2021
    Messages:
    10,053
    Likes Received:
    4,347
    Here I am running Catalina on a "frozen" Mac Pro from 2010 with 2 Xeon X5690s at 3.46ghz each 128gb RAM as my DAW.

    No-one cares about Windows users' input. Although, the first "doom and gloom" OP reads like that also.

    Any serious Mac users will know this is going to be 0 problem. "oh no, my customers archived Logic sessions won't open!", really? Because that kind of person has plenty of money to buy a Mini and freeze it.
     
  9. shinyzen

    shinyzen Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2023
    Messages:
    1,482
    Likes Received:
    894
    I dont think your statement is true in the slightest. Apple is developing some extremely powerful chips, and are continuing down that path. They want to get some of the AI development into their systems. Besides, all you have to do is look at their web store to see they are not just a cellphone compnay lol. I almost feel like you are trolling even.
     
  10. clone

    clone Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2021
    Messages:
    10,053
    Likes Received:
    4,347
    Almost? Is there some sort of other purpose to trying to derail threads about OS you don't even use with off-topic garbage?
     
Loading...
Loading...