Steinberg...

Discussion in 'Cubase / Nuendo' started by vayabahia, Dec 1, 2025 at 11:58 AM.

  1. vayabahia

    vayabahia Producer

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2013
    Messages:
    350
    Likes Received:
    116
    Location:
    Mordor
    The behavior of said company in the business of 2025, still living off the glorious rents of the past...

    https://www.tiktok.com/@dilanmoreno459/video/7008710071089777925?lang=es


    By the way, I'd like to take this opportunity to ask (any expert who might happen to stumble across this corner of the internet): Which version of Cubase is best suited for OSX Sequoia?

    Thanks in advance.

     
  2.  
  3. glassybrick

    glassybrick Producer

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2020
    Messages:
    393
    Likes Received:
    121
    What do you mean? check google trends. Cubase number same as PT
     
  4. PulseWave

    PulseWave Audiosexual

    Joined:
    May 4, 2025
    Messages:
    3,134
    Likes Received:
    1,700
    Best Answer
    Cubase 14 (Pro/Artist/Elements) is the best-suited version for macOS Sequoia.

    It's fully native for Apple Silicon (M-series chips like M1/M2/M3/M4), with optimized performance and no major compatibility caveats reported in recent user feedback or guides.
     
  5. dl65875

    dl65875 Producer

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2021
    Messages:
    206
    Likes Received:
    85
    People have to wake up and stop believing what they are told on Social Media, especially TikTok of all places.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1
    • Love it! Love it! x 1
    • List
  6. zpaces

    zpaces Platinum Record

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2016
    Messages:
    446
    Likes Received:
    219
    Steinberg lost their value a while back when they decided to go for bedroom producers. Their price and upgrade policies are beyond sh*t!
     
  7. Neurolepticer

    Neurolepticer Noisemaker

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2025
    Messages:
    11
    Likes Received:
    5
    Location:
    Germany
    If you did a little more research on Steinberg, instead of believing everything someone writes on the internet, you wouldn't write something like that. Cubase has always been groundbreaking; anything Cubase introduces, other DAWs adopt two to three months later. You pay the full price for the Pro version of Cubase once, and then you get every major update for €99/$99. That's reasonable for what you get. Their other products are also reasonably priced (and high-quality); Native Instruments, for example, charges considerably more.
     
  8. ArticStorm

    ArticStorm Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2011
    Messages:
    8,746
    Likes Received:
    4,595
    Location:
    AudioSexPro
    dont oversell Steinberg here, every DAW has something new, which others adapted. Thats simple how a market works.
     
    • Like Like x 2
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • List
  9. ghostwriter

    ghostwriter Ultrasonic

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2019
    Messages:
    157
    Likes Received:
    25
    cubase is cumbersome to use and looks awful. at least pro-tools has a logical flow to it. but steinberg also makes dorico, which i love.
     
  10. vayabahia

    vayabahia Producer

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2013
    Messages:
    350
    Likes Received:
    116
    Location:
    Mordor
    Thx!
     
  11. pop 5tudi0oz

    pop 5tudi0oz Newbie

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2021
    Messages:
    11
    Likes Received:
    0
    As a professional, I've worked with most DAWs in my studio and my production company (Pro24, then Cubase/Ableton Live/Notator, then Logic/FL Studio/DP/PT). Pro Tools is by far my least favorite; its architecture is so outdated and unintuitive. If I had to give up Cubase (which I bought in 1989), I'd choose Ableton Live or FL Studio, even though I think you can do excellent work with any of them.
     
    • Winner Winner x 2
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • List
  12. zpaces

    zpaces Platinum Record

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2016
    Messages:
    446
    Likes Received:
    219
    Are you on their salary list? :rofl:

    Other DAWs are quite cheaper and offer a way more!
    Btw. the stem splitting feature in Cubase came later than in other DAWs.
     
  13. ItsFine

    ItsFine Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2023
    Messages:
    851
    Likes Received:
    505
    I put 3 "generalist" DAWs on equal foot: Logic, Cubase, Studio One

    If i needed to drop Cubase (Windows), it would be for Studio One.
    On Mac, it would be probably Logic, until i need cross platform.
     
  14. glassybrick

    glassybrick Producer

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2020
    Messages:
    393
    Likes Received:
    121
    Unlike all the others, Cubase is a Swiss knife.
    In a single project, you can write an orchestral score, edit audio, pitch correct vocals and align them to notes and rhythm, and mix everything together, and make music/sound for Video. and ofc Dolby & OMF...
    And you can do all this without having to use third-party software.

    A program with such extensive functionality cannot be perfect.
     
    Last edited: Dec 1, 2025 at 6:52 PM
  15. fireface

    fireface Member

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2022
    Messages:
    40
    Likes Received:
    15
    Cubase had Spectralayers integrated into it long time ago with ARA support.
     
  16. zpaces

    zpaces Platinum Record

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2016
    Messages:
    446
    Likes Received:
    219
    There must be have been reason to go for native stem splitting.
     
Loading...
Similar Threads - Steinberg Forum Date
Any reason why Steinberg libraries aren't showing up in instruments? Cubase / Nuendo Jul 14, 2025
Delete Steinberg applications from applications folder and leave plugins? Mac / Hackintosh Jul 12, 2025
Steinberg Halion Samplers, Synthesizers Jun 5, 2025
Expansions e.g XTC (Via Steinberg Download Assistant) Cubase / Nuendo May 12, 2025
[FREEWARE] Steinberg built-in ASIO Driver Software News Mar 6, 2025
Loading...