Actually, any Beatles song comes from Suno.ai, there's a Mcartney interview saying that
https://shorturl.at/3wSew

 

this is what was sent out by a distributor: (landr.com)

 

Last edited: Jun 19, 2025 at 9:35 AM

and here is a small screen shot of the release status of a song. You may notice it was accepted by applemusic, by spotify and by most of other streaming platforms but it seems t hat someone at Deezer judged it to be as "noise", despite of a real human played bass guitar and solo guitar that was recorded.

 

Last edited: Jun 19, 2025 at 9:45 AM

Can ChatGPT record and master a hit based on his advice?

No !

 

Last edited: Jun 19, 2025 at 2:16 PM

There was a post about this kind of thing a while back, I believe on here. Anyway, it was the same classification of peoples' music as "noise" or some other "non-music" term. The music had been ambient music, drone music, and other such material. I believe the gripe was that it had all been demonetized. So when you factor that kind of thing in, the recent copyright office decisions about AI material and also the EULA terms of some of the sites like Suno, and then coupled with some of the platforms demonetizing artists without enough sales; looking at them trying to demonetize "ai created music" as some win for real artists is sort of wishful thinking. They could not care less about what they are selling and about "real artists" at all. The real "music industry" has never supported "DIY" musicians to start with.

 

AI music is currently embarrassingly clumsy and incredibly easy to hear a mile off, same with its mixing or mastering efforts. Those who can't hear it being like this would be described the same way. It's early days and I have no doubt it will create some incredible music in the future. Nothing can really defeat human creativity, as AI is just learning what humans have created. An irony would be AI learning from its own creations and coming up with something completely amazing and unique. It probably will.

 

Last edited: Jun 19, 2025 at 11:02 AM

Now there is this new trend: people producing hundreds of AI songs and uploading them to platforms, to then, through bots, increase the views and generate income. This procedure is considered a scam
https://www.forbes.com/sites/leslie...lion-streaming-scam-using-ai-generated-songs/

Music platforms are trying to defend themselves from these illicit behaviors, but there is a risk that the algorithm will become too selective and, due to false positives, demonetize even non-fraudulent content. Many of us have already experienced the frustration of having tracks flagged for copyright by mistake, now we will have a new issue: fighting against the anti-AI algorithm. Unfortunately, opening a dispute against the platforms is mission impossible, those who have been through it already know it

 

If the shady behaviours of human setup AI networks producing fraudulent content (like what we've seen where AI bots easily upload tracks under the names or REAL ARTISTS ON THEIR OWN PROFILES - this is true!) eventually brings down Spotify / streaming services and the distribution companies that don't even have two factor authentication for uploading tracks under any name, then I'm all for it.

 

I tried arguing with ChatGBT about composing music, but 36 hours later I couldn't keep my eyes open any longer despite drinking liters of coffee and chugging down like a case of Red Bull, fell asleep with my face flat on my computer keyboard. When I awoke 7 hours later I heard it's obnoxious voice still calling me "You stupid wetwork moron" over and over again, and when I saw myself in the mirror my face looked like a QUERTY keyboard, all a patchwork from laying on it for all those hours.

AI sucks...fuck AI is my new mantra.

 

Last edited: Jun 19, 2025 at 1:03 PM

All LLM AI models is just a gimmick and financial blob for stupid investors.

 

Oh yeah. People are sheep and they'll eat anything fed to them the proper way. The novelty of a fully AI production will be presented to them just like the new pet rock and will explode. I should probably do it but I'm too lazy.

 

There is a risk of needing certification to publish your music. To be pessimistic, soon only major artists will be free to publish music, the others will always be filtered by the algorithm. This anti-AI fury can generate authoritarian drift

 

A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for Bitwig Studio that allows Claude to control your DAW.

https://github.com/WeModulate/bitwig-mcp-server

Example Prompts

• setup_mixing_session: Set up a new mixing session with default settings
• create_track_template: Create a track template with specific devices and settings
• optimize_track_settings: Get recommendations for optimizing track settings

 

Last edited: Jun 19, 2025 at 7:34 PM

The scam portion of this guy's criminal charges are not because the songs were created with AI. They could have been terrible garbage music (or good music) created any way he could generate them. They fraudulent activity is in the fake listens, clicks, and advertising views.

This is an actual financial scam, which you are somewhat misrepresenting as being about the content. The same scam could be conducted using real music and "click farms" to falsify the number of clicks. As an example; we cannot say all cars are "illegal" because they can be used to drive to a robbery. Without the financial aspect of the crime, all this guy would be guilty of would be creating and uploading bad music. People do that every day with software called a "DAW", and with music they did not write a single note of, using a software called "Band In A Box".

 

From what I gather, due to repeated scams, the anti-AI algorithm will be strengthened. This means that the platforms will have the final word on my artistic content. The point is that the one who judges what I'm allowed to publish is not an external organization, but the platform itself. This sounds terrible to me: Soon we will have to pay for a certification to be free to publish content (it is already happening with X premium): abuse of power is around the corner.
I have no idea how they could fight the AI monetization scam, but I don't like at all the scenario they are setting up now

 

Damn, that's actually a real answer to this question. So in theory, with this bridge it could be possible to use Claude's voice mode to operate the daw?

 

I didn't test it yet but will next time. I think this is one of the first way/step into an interesting collaboration between the KI and me as musician. I don't won't (but sure for many) a new top 10 track out of the box via KI. I want help from the KI integrated in my DAW where my deficits are in professional music making.