How many msec is 170 samples at 96k?

Thanks. I can't remember how to calculate this.

 

Hi @tommyzai, here is the result: Duration (ms) 1770,8333333333333


https://calculator.academy/samples-to-ms-calculator/

 

Thanks so much!!!

 

This is wrong by a factor of 1000! It's 1,77083ms. Try yourself and enter 96000 samples for 96kHz SR, should be 1000ms, right?

Don't copy and paste everything you find in the interwebs, my friend.

 

The calculator used should be labelled Hertz, because that is how it is doing that math.

how many milliseconds is 170 samples at 96KHZ
ChatGPT said:

To convert samples to milliseconds, use the following formula:

Milliseconds=SamplesSample Rate×1000\text{Milliseconds} = \frac{\text{Samples}}{\text{Sample Rate}} \times 1000Milliseconds=Sample RateSamples×1000
For 170 samples at a 96 kHz sample rate:

Milliseconds=17096000×1000\text{Milliseconds} = \frac{170}{96000} \times 1000Milliseconds=96000170×1000
Calculating this:

Milliseconds=1.7708 ms (approximately)\text{Milliseconds} = 1.7708 \, \text{ms (approximately)}Milliseconds=1.7708ms (approximately)
So, 170 samples at 96 kHz is roughly 1.77 milliseconds.

 

Last edited: Nov 7, 2024 at 4:35 AM

Wow, that's elementary school math. But needing an online calculator for this, copying and pasting a screenshot and rewriting the obviously wrong solution is just ridiculous.

 

It's 1,77083ms.
(1/96000)*170*1000

 

Or simply break it down to 170/96.
96000 samples/sec -> 96 samples/msec

 

Milliseconds=1.7708 ms. but in Europe, being typed as Milliseconds=1,7708 ms

The "funny" thing is he is probably trying to add this as a latency offset, and Logic would just have you add it as 309 samples anyway.