192kHz 24 bit is rendering at different LUFS

Discussion in 'Working with Sound' started by stav, Jun 12, 2024.

  1. stav

    stav Noisemaker

    Joined:
    May 25, 2024
    Messages:
    50
    Likes Received:
    5
    why when i'm rendering to 192khz 24 bit instead of 44.1khz of 16 bit i get different LUFS?

    does that mean i need to change the threshold of the limitor on the same audio render if i need to get same LUFS for both?
     
  2.  
  3. shinjiya

    shinjiya Producer

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2018
    Messages:
    170
    Likes Received:
    103
    It's not immediately obvious to me but I would start by checking the ceiling and if true peak is on.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • List
  4. Baxter

    Baxter Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2011
    Messages:
    3,870
    Likes Received:
    2,699
    Location:
    Sweden
    More info needed. How much difference? Are we talking overs/ISP (tiny) difference? What's your peak value?
    Loudness should not be affected by simple SRC.
     
    Last edited: Jun 13, 2024
  5. No Avenger

    No Avenger Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2017
    Messages:
    8,985
    Likes Received:
    6,215
    Location:
    Europe
    Let me guess, 44,1 has a higher LUFS?
     
  6. SineWave

    SineWave Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2011
    Messages:
    4,369
    Likes Received:
    3,470
    Location:
    Where the sun doesn't shine.
    Not enough info. Could be a few things, so it would help if you tell us what limiter you use, what oversampling if you use it, which lufs meter, is true-peak on? I think I'm missing something... ah - which LUFS? S? M? I? And how much is the difference?
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • List
  7. Jayster

    Jayster Kapellmeister

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2018
    Messages:
    123
    Likes Received:
    74
    There is likely SRC (Sample Rate Conversion) involved. If SRC is involved, level(s) will differ slightly as there is a lot of calculations, filtering, etc. involved. Do not expect exact same levels once samplerate(s) get changed!
     
  8. stav

    stav Noisemaker

    Joined:
    May 25, 2024
    Messages:
    50
    Likes Received:
    5
    like 6 LUFS difference

    It was showing me around -13LUFS for 44.1kz 16bit and -8 LUFS for 192Kz 24 bit

    ozone by izotope...i haven't checked the settings but it was same settings for both i need to run more tests i did it just one time
     
    • Interesting Interesting x 1
    • Useful Useful x 1
    • List
  9. SineWave

    SineWave Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2011
    Messages:
    4,369
    Likes Received:
    3,470
    Location:
    Where the sun doesn't shine.
    6dB is a pretty big difference, especially if it's LUFS-I "integrated". I don't think SRC can be blamed for such a difference.

    You must be doing something to the input, before the limiter, that influences the input volume to the limiter somehow.
     
    Last edited: Jun 13, 2024
    • Like Like x 1
    • Creative Creative x 1
    • List
  10. xorome

    xorome Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2021
    Messages:
    857
    Likes Received:
    671
    Maybe you just forgot re-ticking some checkbox after changing sample rate.
    Maybe you're using plugins that don't work correctly at that sample rate (Airwindows comes to mind).
    Maybe you're getting incredibly unlucky phase shifts (try linear phase).
     
  11. tzzsmk

    tzzsmk Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2016
    Messages:
    3,358
    Likes Received:
    2,049
    Location:
    Heart of Europe
    try measuring at 96kHz
    try measuring with different plugin
    try measuring in different DAW
     
  12. Xupito

    Xupito Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2012
    Messages:
    7,083
    Likes Received:
    3,912
    Location:
    Europe
    Mix at 384Mhz
    You're missing all the analog-mojo-saturation I can easily hear in the 167.1416 - 169 Mhz range
     
    • Funny Funny x 6
    • Disagree Disagree x 1
    • List
  13. Baxter

    Baxter Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2011
    Messages:
    3,870
    Likes Received:
    2,699
    Location:
    Sweden
    6LUFS is A LOT! You are obviously doing something wrong in the gain-staging.
    What's the peak value of the finished master of both files (with the different sample rates)? Both should have very similar peak value.
     
    Last edited: Jun 13, 2024
  14. justwannadownload

    justwannadownload Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2019
    Messages:
    1,282
    Likes Received:
    821
    Location:
    Central Asia
    Using any Acustica Audio plugins? They work poorly with higher samplerate.
    Maybe some other older and shittier plugins?
     
  15. BlackHawk

    BlackHawk Producer

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2021
    Messages:
    248
    Likes Received:
    125
    Not "a lot". It's twice as much. It's doubled.
     
  16. Baxter

    Baxter Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2011
    Messages:
    3,870
    Likes Received:
    2,699
    Location:
    Sweden
    Yeah. That's A LOT. Like "holy-shit-WTF-happened"-A LOT.
     
    Last edited: Jun 13, 2024
  17. No Avenger

    No Avenger Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2017
    Messages:
    8,985
    Likes Received:
    6,215
    Location:
    Europe
    Could be that a plugin can't deal with 192kHz SR (hello Waves) and goes bonkers.
     
  18. Lad Impala

    Lad Impala Platinum Record

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2024
    Messages:
    438
    Likes Received:
    202
    Location:
    In bloom
    are you sure you aren't measuring the LUFS before the ozone?
    the measure plugin should be the last thing in your master chain, after the limiter
     
    • Interesting Interesting x 1
    • List
  19. soldina

    soldina Ultrasonic

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2023
    Messages:
    31
    Likes Received:
    26
    Does your soundcard only go up to 96khz by any chance (wink wink Audient)? Because using a higher sample rate than your hardware can handle will only result in a volume increase.
     
Loading...
Similar Threads - 192kHz rendering different Forum Date
Kontakt Libraries at 96/192kHz Kontakt Dec 3, 2022
Fatal flaw on 192khz rate BitWig May 4, 2022
Is 192khz only marketing Mixing and Mastering Dec 6, 2021
192Khz USB Audio Interface for composer Soundgear Oct 11, 2013
Freeze on random rendering value Live Apr 2, 2024
Loading...