Maybe topics where AI is a big part/factor could be Tagged and grouped in a Subforum.. (but maintain the regular classification..) Otherwise it may be confusing: EQ with AI, where do you post it, in Audio Software or in AI? As MK said it can permeate many topics so things could get astray.. (I also mostly follow the headlines from AS tho..) Last edited: Aug 12, 2023
Yes of course, unfortunately we like it or not, it will be part of the future in life in general, and more so in art. And even if it is, we must be informed so as not to be left out of the system
Yes, Olymoon is correct here. The vast majority of time "AI" is stated because it's trending. Most of the time it simply is some at least strange behavior in the frequency and/or harmonics structure, without anything that was "learned" there. I think "Software" covers everything necessary.
I'm sure many seasoned musicians feel that their replacement by AI is still a long way into the future. Maybe they've tried VST plugins like Orb Composer or InstaComposer and decided that the result is too generic and not really useful (I have). But the coding is already in place, it only needs VST implementation and it's almost certainly already being programmed. I want to share the video that made me suggest an AI section. I would also urge you to watch other videos from this channel.
My first attempt at creating the post didn't initially seem to work, there was no message saying my post had been created so I tried refreshing the post listing page and my post still wasn't there after a couple of minutes. That's why I tried again and the second time I was informed that my post had been created.
We will probably get duplicate threads about duplicated programs, and then duplicated AI programmers. Talk about working yourself out of a job.
I don't think AI section makes sense, within a year, everything will have some kind of AI code inside - DAWs, plugins, OSes.... why would you need dedicated AI section, it's like you wanted dedicated section for 16bit and 24bit audio
There are crystal clear videos about generative A.I out there. Their defense perpetually is "We only use what is publicly available" (Mira Murati). Legal arguments against this that are logical also say that when you are in the street, taxis, buses and cars are also publicly available but when you take those it is called theft. Basically they entertainment industry aside from the majors is trying to get the copyright offices and ASCAP, and worldwide royalty collection agencies to stop being toothless tigers. Nobody denies the potential functionality of generative A.I. It boils down to credit where it is due.
