Sir Paul McCartney says artificial intelligence has enabled a 'final' Beatles song

Discussion in 'Lounge' started by phumb-reh, Jun 13, 2023.

?

Is AI destroying The Beatles?!?!

  1. YES, THIS IS HERESY

    14 vote(s)
    43.8%
  2. No, it's alright

    18 vote(s)
    56.3%
  1. Cardamom

    Cardamom Platinum Record

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2015
    Messages:
    227
    Likes Received:
    254
    No, no ... NOOOOooOO!! It's really an awful song - George was right.


    But then check this out? Someone's already AI'd the piece as if the boys had done it! A month ago!?
     
  2. Kluster

    Kluster Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2018
    Messages:
    722
    Likes Received:
    661
    If he wants new music out there he should retire and let young people put it out.
    Him, Springsteen, Grohl, all these have made enough money and should let hungry young groups onto the stages they're monopolizing with stale reruns of Yesterday, Glory Days and Nirvana echoes.
     
  3. clone

    clone Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2021
    Messages:
    7,770
    Likes Received:
    3,426
    Oh, hell no. There are plenty of other Rick Wakeman, Todd Rundgren style dinosaurs still out there that I would agree with. Dave Grohl is 54, and has not been riding the Nirvana coat tails all this time. Flea is 6 years older than him, should he quit too?
     
  4. Moogerfooger

    Moogerfooger Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2016
    Messages:
    1,452
    Likes Received:
    787
    I love how this is turning into an argument about dinosaur rock stars money and the ethics of ai… The music industry is dead. Ai already won…. I’ve had a great time being a member here. So long and thanks for all the fish
     
  5. Trurl

    Trurl Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2019
    Messages:
    2,480
    Likes Received:
    1,467
    I am reminded of the words of HAL 9000 when he saud "this conversation can serve no further purpose. Goodbye."
     
    Last edited: Jun 16, 2023
Loading...
Loading...