i have no problem with the rest i completely agree that is not a viable way to get cheap energy given natural limitations, i think it doesnt make sense saying radio waves are already existing before being used by radio stations, the radio station converts energy to emitt radio waves, so why these waves are not manufactured there? i don't get it.

 

okay...now that i see where your issue is, it has become clear. i very literally mean that radio stations aren't the arbiter of the EM waves, they run from a device not manufactured by themselves, but are outsourced from various companies and amplified. you can't broadcast over nothing. there is no button at a radio station that says "press me to make radio waves," they just broadcast over it. the radio station itself doesn't produce them. i was referring to a different comment that wasn't your own. see the first page. can't believe that is what we have been arguing over.

 

Sorry but my english is weak, i thought you meant something entirely different, i thought you meant that radio stations are hijacking natural radio waves, i honestly didn't know that they just amplified the signal from other companies, but it's plausible so i have no problem with that..

 

i see. my main point being that it takes much more energy to produce these fields than we would gain in the end, in their current state. free energy would be to power the myriad of devices in the first place. there are a lot of needed powered parts to make this concept a reality. i understand how this could be misconstrued. no worries, friend.

 

i totally agree

 

There's no such thing as free energy as in 100% energetic efficiency. It's impossible.

Sure, if you're not naive, you most likely know how the world works. Most probably quite a few efficient and sustainable energetic technologies have been suppressed along the last decades, all in the name of indecent amounts of profit. There are a lot of rumors around, some very well documented, about people being killed or discredited for promoting other kinds of feasible energy sources other than oil...

However, free energy, as stated in conspiracy theory forums, only exists in hoaxes and fake youtube videos.

Maybe, somewhere in the future, we'll learn how to harness energy from gravity, or whatever combination of forces that keep the universe glued together, or maybe we'll master nuclear fusion and create our own miniaturized suns... Even though, these certainly wouldn't be free, as in 100% efficient, as in moto perpetuo.

 

Last edited: May 21, 2016

Some very interesting videos to watch on a human channeling an extra-terrestrial about free energy

 

reminds me of stealing power from telephone lines that are powered by telecom service providers ^^ but dont overdo, they will notice!

 

It's hard to even start describing the depth of the inconsistencies present in this description...

First you would need to prove that channeling is actually a real phenomenon...Then you would have to prove that extra-terrestrials exist and, if they do, that it's possible to channel them...Then you would also have to prove that free energy is actually feasible.

Or maybe you want us to believe that just because it's on youtube it must be true, right?

 

RMorgan, I think that your avatar picture and your irrelevant diatribe above match very well. And we all know Mr Bean is a bit of an idiot.

Look, anybody can write anything they want, it doesn't make it so or true, valid, intelligent or anything else you can think of necessarily. Your own comment likewise. People take it or leave it. No one needs to prove anything, or are we in this forum thread involved in some academic battle to prove and disprove each other? I simply enjoy passing on alternative ways of thinking about the nature of reality when I come across them. The more I look into alternative research about our sciences the closer I am coming to the conclusion that there has been one giant f-king stitch-up for humanity by powerful people who have conditioned us to accept scientific facts that turn out to be mostly 'beliefs' rather than facts. Science seems to be a belief system full of academics with lots of 'theories' based around beliefs. I will not give examples. I think you need to have a desire in your heart to search for the truths and you will find what I'm talking about.

To take your final line about anything on YouTube must be true has me a little worried about you. It sounds like an attack on anyone who has ever believed anything they've watched on YouTube to be factual. We are all taken-in every day by the media, our education system, law and government institutions, this is quite well documented already. It is now easy to prove that the 'elite' control most areas of the human existance. The religious organisations may well have also been comepletely invented as control systems. And yes, who is to say that conspiracy theorists are themselves agents working on behalf of the elite anyway giving us alternative bull? We simply can never be sure.

By the way, your use of the word inconsistencies is inappropriate. There is nothing in my statement that warrants any need for one thing to be consistent with another.

 

Says the guy with a gorilla avatar picture...lolololololololololol

Really? loloololololol

But I get your point, mate. I used to think like you when I was in my twenties.

Feel free to believe someone who claims to be channeling an ET lecturing about free energy, even if he doesn't present any reliable piece of data to substantiate his claim. Go on and believe that Jesus is coming back next week, or that the British royals are reptilians, chemtrails, bigfoot, chupacabras or unicorns. When you don't care about substantiation, you can actually believe whatever you want, right?

I'd rather believe in claims that can actually be supported by evidence. That's the nature of reality. Whatever is left is up to your imagination, which is ok, as long as you don't try to push it as truth.

 

Last edited: May 22, 2016

The chinese will steal the plans from the patent servers and build it themselves but it will be so crappy that it will ruin the reputation of the idea forever. Commie bastages!!!

 

Free Energy

 

I'm sick of theories.

 

It's not though! You have to feed the squirrel.

 

I am devoid of empathy and morality. Let this disgusting little creature eat its own poop and give me electricity!

 

Me too but it'll die and you'll have to buy a new one. If you steal one... then maybe free energy!

 

Free energy? Seriously?
My tip:
Reduce internet use, increase education.