I don't think so... i think that cr**ked teams can't work gratis... for example stl tonalities were cr**ked easily but amphub and tonehub still are uncr**ked since they were produced. I think that software audio houses pay for their best products a tot for year (or years?) to guarantee their products uncracked for a while.
If some plugins didn't work properly or became unstable depends by the skill of the team which releases the plugins.
if you don't want to wait or play with a more stable plugin you can always buy the original ahahahah

 

in fact the cracked version of pro tools has 0 issues compared to my legit one. 0. except it being only windows.

 

I'm no expert but I'd think the more a plugin relies on internet, like this two "hub" seem, the more hard are to vaccinate

 

Until now i only seen this versions for Kontakt

 

I think it is getting harder. For an example we used to see tons of Plugin Alliance plug-ins and little little it's gone to nothing.. Neither teams have done any type of updates nor the tons of new plug-ins released over time.. I think it's just going to get worse and soon it will slow down more.

 

As a veteran music warez consumer I can't see this. I rather see more the opposite. We have several new teams and barely shit still not vaccinated. I can't barely keep up with some updates. At this point I can't help but remember the famous R2R complaint a few years ago when they made up a timeline of the scene basically saying "all was good before, but since we're the bosses everything is going to shit"
Of course, of course... man, people sure freaked out

It's true that there's a couple not fully done. The famous PTools? I don't even remember what was but seems it wasn't fully cr*cked.
About iZotope there're already two fixes from R2R.

Ok, say the latest PAlliance plugins aren't cr*cked. But the last ones cracked aren't exactly jurassic.

 

Watching companies and developers post statements like "The most secure...." ~OR~ "Our protection is the strongest.." and similar comments, it almost issues a challenge to any hacker to turn around, crack it and say "NO it isn't" just because they said that.
The smartest thing any developer could do who invented something with new protection would be to advertise absolutely nothing other than the quality of the product they are selling.

 

Just wondering...what is this "sister site" I hear about here all the time? I assume there is something that prevents someone from actually naming that sister site...Just wondering if it is like the "illuminati" of audio warez sites.

 

What do u mean?

 

They are freemason.