Am I wrong or almost all effect presets suck!?

Discussion in 'Software' started by Vampgirl, Jan 4, 2022.

  1. justwannadownload

    justwannadownload Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2019
    Messages:
    1,310
    Likes Received:
    849
    Location:
    Central Asia
    You kind of aren't.

    What you're saying is, they didn't suck when there were nothing better. I can get that.
    What I'm saying is, there are lots and lots of all-around better tools right now. A skilled engineer can do a good mix in a GarbageBand or with Dead Duck plugs, so the fact that you can mix well with Waves only speaks of you.
     
  2. F.L.O.W.

    F.L.O.W. Producer

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2021
    Messages:
    304
    Likes Received:
    114
    Exactly. That is said perfectly.
    Again, this proves that everything is contextual...
    If I was born 10 years later I may be raving about iZotope or someone newer.
    There are so many good developers now that I end up using a smattering of plugins from very many devs on a song.
    And hardly any Waves now, it's true.
    But great name engineers I have worked with as a musician have worked wonders with Waves, constantly.
    Most devs are all using the same algos and maths anyway, so all this doesn't really matter to me now, after so long.
    If I have to gaffa tape a song together, I will!
    Whatever gets the track finished is all that matters.
    Apart from a small handful of helpful plugins recently, everything else is 'much of a muchness', as is said in the UK.
    Yes. But they don't suck now either!
    How can they if they were so widely used?
    So really, "better" is mostly nonsense. imo.
    Apart from a few helpful plugins that have recenty surfaced over the last several years.
    I have used PluginDoctor on lots of my plugins, so I am aware of what is absolute rubbish and snake oil, and what is useable.
    When we get rid of the snake oil, there is hardly any "better" or best really.
    Just as with anything else in life.
    It all just comes down to preference and budget.
    Even though every DAW out there has most everything we need anyway regards tools to complete a track!
     
    Last edited: Jan 4, 2022
  3. Atlantis84

    Atlantis84 Platinum Record

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2021
    Messages:
    679
    Likes Received:
    293
    u said a lot bro some of they old plugins are very good if u people know how to use them
     
  4. justwannadownload

    justwannadownload Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2019
    Messages:
    1,310
    Likes Received:
    849
    Location:
    Central Asia
    @F.L.O.W. I can't agree that it's all contextual. Whenever a mixing engineer approaches a track, there is a multitude of small, but very specific tasks and goals they set for themselves. Said tasks and goals can be incredibly varied, but they are nonetheless fairly specific and technical.
    I argue that, for any and every more or less common task, there's a better fitting tool on the market than Waves.
    I also argue that with Waves, it's easier to mess up the mix quality than it is to improve it.

    You are also not exactly right about the maths. Maths is what distinguishes the greatest developers from the good ones. Sure lots of good devs regurgitate the same algos, but the greatest ones devise their own.
     
    • Interesting Interesting x 1
    • List
  5. 8bits

    8bits Producer

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2018
    Messages:
    130
    Likes Received:
    83
    Location:
    Milky Way
    Oh..it seems you re at the start of your amazing musician composer life, so as some one already wrote in this thread, presets are only a starting point where you can understand how the fx parameters works, now you can imagine if a single preset would be able to fix all the vocal tracks in the music universe? Impossible, all will be sooo boring :) because all the music will be the same…isn’t it?
    So, just what you need to catch in a preset, is a concept study, try to modify some parameters, for example in a compressor try to set the treshold to zero then slowly increase and understand with your ears what is happening…this is only your start.
    For well understand how fx are working today you have a nice powerful internet toy called youtube, just query it and learn how much you can about reverbs, delay, compressors, preamp…is all about a vocalist needs to know a bit even how to use as insert or sends, you will discover one nice thing…(spoiler) you are an artist: producer, dj, vocalist, musician drummer or guitarist or whatever you are..you FIRST ARE AN ARTIST, so once you will learn the basic mixing rules you will learn also that you can break em with your creativity.
    In the sister site you can find alot of tutorials..i can say to you that basic rules wants preamp-compressor in insert and reverb and delay in send but you can find tons of right suggestions that can say to you to use fx in another way….
    Welcome in this amazing world, there is also some nice sites where u can learn about training your hears…in my 80’s this was impossible..
    try for training your ears (for understand how fx also working) https://www.soundgym.co/
    And for the rest try youtube as i told you or also the sister site has a nice document section.
    Enjoy my old 2 cents experience
     
  6. F.L.O.W.

    F.L.O.W. Producer

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2021
    Messages:
    304
    Likes Received:
    114
    Yes! And I said:
    With no snake oil, as I said, we are only ever dealing with good devs...
    Yes! And I said:
    So you are just echoing me and we agree.
    Cheers.
    Please look more precisely at what people write! :winker:
    Ah! Unfortunately for you you have unwittingly proved me right!
    EVERYTHING in life is contextual!
    It will be hard for you to prove me wrong. It's been well studied and I've already been through this decades ago!
    Seriously. Context is everything.
     
  7. poly

    poly Platinum Record

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2016
    Messages:
    285
    Likes Received:
    173
    Location:
    Hä?
    Absolutely right!
     
  8. justwannadownload

    justwannadownload Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2019
    Messages:
    1,310
    Likes Received:
    849
    Location:
    Central Asia
    All of those we've spoken of here devise their own. That's the point. The common algos are pretty much not a thing in a context of our discussion. This is why I felt it's worth pointing out.
     
  9. F.L.O.W.

    F.L.O.W. Producer

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2021
    Messages:
    304
    Likes Received:
    114
    Cool. I just feel I already covered it and you were pin pointing things that I had already implied.
    But "context"? Hard to disagree with logically, is all.
     
  10. justwannadownload

    justwannadownload Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2019
    Messages:
    1,310
    Likes Received:
    849
    Location:
    Central Asia
    I'd replace "Contextual" with "Subject to causality", but okay.
    I take issue with how you used contextuality to dismiss Waves' shittiness. By this logic, the shittiest noisiest aliasiest SoundSpot compressor can't be called shitty because it can make the synthetic drums reamped through the loudspeaker in the next room and recorded in 8bit/22kHz more pronounced if you use it in parallel with hardware Elysia Alpha and some zynaptiq restoration.
    That's not how contextuality works. It might be contextually good in this specific circumstances, provided you can recreate them with any degree of consistency, but it's still universally shitty.
     
    Last edited: Jan 4, 2022
  11. F.L.O.W.

    F.L.O.W. Producer

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2021
    Messages:
    304
    Likes Received:
    114
    Don't remember that at all!
    So, quite the opposite...if you pay attention as I asked already! Just saying.
    The prior sentence you made? Agreed! haha What are you on? hehe
    Carry on "taking issue" if you want.
    I already said it's not debatable. So with me, it's not debatable!
    I'd like to put you in a room with Professors Of Music I know.
    Then you'll be on my level re. context.

    Topic:
    Yes, presets suck!
    Next!
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Disagree Disagree x 1
    • List
  12. justwannadownload

    justwannadownload Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2019
    Messages:
    1,310
    Likes Received:
    849
    Location:
    Central Asia
    ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

    Anyways, I'm done with off-topic, Oly plz dont ban
     
  13. Lois Lane

    Lois Lane Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2019
    Messages:
    4,788
    Likes Received:
    4,703
    Location:
    Somewhere Over The Rainbow
    I think that the default preset of Fab Filter Pro-R doesn't suck and I use it a lot on my vocal treatment. Bang out of the box is what sold me on it.
     
    • Like Like x 2
    • Useful Useful x 1
    • List
  14. Swatch

    Swatch Producer

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2014
    Messages:
    228
    Likes Received:
    84
    Location:
    Ger
    You can try waves Studiorack.
    The presets will combine the waves plugins.
    I use the Sean divine studiorack presets.
    They're awesome.
     
  15. SineWave

    SineWave Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2011
    Messages:
    4,432
    Likes Received:
    3,570
    Location:
    Where the sun doesn't shine.
    Presets are always just a starting point, so you have to adjust them at least a little depending on what you want it to sound like, especially reverb.

    If you want the simplest insert chain to get good sounding vocals with Waves plugins, just try R or H-EQ into CLA-2A and a little [10-30% wet] H-Delay at the end. 2A is almost like a preset compressor and it sounds excellent on vocals. All you need to choose is how much to compress or limit. Limiter mode has higher ratio, so it's better for drums, and compressor mode with lower ratio is better for vocals, but you might find the limiter mode sounding better for vocals in some particular case. Just use your ears and listen to the whole mix, not just soloed.

    I used to use Waves a lot, but it was until about a decade ago. I don't use them any more because there are better sounding plugins nowadays. I still think Renaissance, Hybrid, CLA, Vintage and SSL series Waves plugins are absolutely usable to make a great sounding production, though.

    Anyway, some EQ to shape the vocal before compressing it with some LA-2A, LA-3A, or Urei-1176 emulation, [maybe some saturator here], some nice sounding delay plugin at the end if needed, and a bit of reverb you like either as an insert or send effect. For vocals it works better to have it as the last plugin in the insert chain. That's the vocal chain I would recommend to anyone who's not very experienced with mixing.

    My 2p. Cheers! :wink:
     
    Last edited: Jan 4, 2022
  16. Vampgirl

    Vampgirl Kapellmeister

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2021
    Messages:
    73
    Likes Received:
    51
    I want to thanks each and everyone of you for your help and insight. This thread has been a great source of information for me and I have already a lot to do and learn from it. I am now going to study Eventide BlackHole, FabFilter, RC20 and Valhalla to see what comes out of it! It would be nice to know which TDR modules are also recommended for live vocal recording.
    Can't thank you guys enough:mates::like: :wink:
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Love it! Love it! x 1
    • List
Loading...
Similar Threads - wrong almost effect Forum Date
What's wrong with my loops??? [solved] Cubase / Nuendo Mar 16, 2024
Why you might be saturating your instruments/mix wrongly. Working with Sound Feb 20, 2024
Output Arcade lines export wrong zip file size Software Sep 22, 2023
What am I doing wrong? Work in Process Feb 22, 2023
Everything You Know About 'Carving Space' with EQ is wrong? Maybe! Mixing and Mastering Dec 13, 2022
Loading...