A question about copyright

Discussion in 'Music' started by nΛve, Mar 22, 2021.

  1. nΛve

    nΛve Member

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2021
    Messages:
    18
    Likes Received:
    15
    Goodnight.


    I am up to date on copyright and its rules, but I have a question and I would like someone to help me.

    Let's imagine that I write an instrumental song and I want to use Steve Jobs's speech at Stanford (very good, by the way) to honor him and share his message. Are these types of records subject to copyright? How can I find out?

    I believe that BMW acquired the copyright to Bruce Lee's famous "Be Water my Friend", in this particular case would it break the law if he used his voice in a song?

    I ask because they are not artistic works. I suppose that most of the news, speeches and interviews that you see on YouTube are not owned by anyone, but I would like someone to shed some light on this topic.


    Thanks a lot

     
    • Interesting Interesting x 1
    • List
  2.  
  3. Ariel Gonzalez

    Ariel Gonzalez Platinum Record

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2020
    Messages:
    552
    Likes Received:
    217
    Location:
    Somewhere Out There
    will you use just a part of the speech to sample? because i think you can use it, but in pieces of 10 seconds at most if i'm not wrong
     
  4. KungPaoFist

    KungPaoFist Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2017
    Messages:
    1,690
    Likes Received:
    971
    Location:
    CA
    Sounds like it's for educational use which might fall under "Fair Use".
     
  5. Smoove Grooves

    Smoove Grooves Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2019
    Messages:
    5,184
    Likes Received:
    1,960
    Not the case at all.
    The individual recordings are.
     
  6. nΛve

    nΛve Member

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2021
    Messages:
    18
    Likes Received:
    15
    Take Steve Jobs's speech as an example.

    I suppose it was originally recorded by a television network (or several) and later it was broadcast. Do TV networks have rights to everything they record? or do they have to buy beforehand what they broadcast? pay the person who makes the speech?

    Now you can see it on YouTube through different channels. What is the deal here?

    I believed that only artistic works had copyrights, since it is the author himself who creates those rights for their legitimate use. Who demands copyright of a speech?

    I am sorry for my ignorance on this point.
     
    • Interesting Interesting x 1
    • List
  7. Smoove Grooves

    Smoove Grooves Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2019
    Messages:
    5,184
    Likes Received:
    1,960
    Best Answer
    Yes; to everything they record unless stated before hand.
    No payment! Lol. They just turn up and point the camera and the mic.
    It's the licensing rights they hold, so you couldn't re-use some BBC footage as your own, obviously. You would have to get permission and would have to credit them.
    There are freelance camera crews who will sell to more than one station, and there are inhouse crews who get the material and then have the use of that for in the future for their channel.

    I don't know all the ins and outs because they change sometimes, but I have experience in television through my father who was in the independent television industry.
    So, recordings like Martin Luther King's "I had a dream" were no doubt owned by someone but then might have become open for public fair-use/educational, even commercial use after so many years.
    But then maybe now the usage rights are owned by the estate. I don't know.
    Copyright only relates to artistic works. We are talking about the usage license, or not, of speeches MADE IN PUBLIC.
    Uh, what? Uh, maybe only the guy that wrote it for the President? But probably not as he is paid to write them!
    If you wrote the speech, stated copyrights, and published it before you publically aired it, then I guess you could stop anybody REPRINTING it without your permission.
    But the recordings made in public would be owned by the respective recorders and could be re-aired.

    So if you borrowed something from a newsreel that is all over YT from different stations, if terrestrial television still existed, they wouldn't be able to prove where you got it from and you would only be up against the freelance crew/person who sold it to all the stations. The stations wouldn't care.
    But for all I know, now you may find yourself up against YT, and not the individual who originally sold the usage and still can.

    Trying to find the address for an American website that has compiled all these interview recordings of people from around the start of the 20th century up until the 60s I think. It's like a social study database.
    I downloaded it all. I can't remember but I think you have to just credit them if you use any of it.
    And they even coded a drum machine and a sequencer chopper for the dialogue into the webpages! I had so much fun!
    And you can download those noodlings too!

    Keep your eyes open for the address in a bit...you'll love it.
    Oh! It HAS been the subject of 2 threads here already too. So you may find it first or someone might post the link now I've said this.
    But I have the address somewhere in my browser...
     
  8. Smoove Grooves

    Smoove Grooves Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2019
    Messages:
    5,184
    Likes Received:
    1,960
  9. nΛve

    nΛve Member

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2021
    Messages:
    18
    Likes Received:
    15
    Could you elaborate on this statement a bit more? Under what circumstances is the use of an audio fragment labeled "educational use"?
     
  10. nΛve

    nΛve Member

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2021
    Messages:
    18
    Likes Received:
    15
    Thanks for the extensive reply. I suppose that each piece of audio should be studied one by one to know what legal situation it is in. Honestly, it seems like a tedious job to me.

    So all the content on this website can be used freely within any composition?
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • List
  11. Aileron

    Aileron Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2017
    Messages:
    523
    Likes Received:
    545
    Location:
    Merseyside
    Right of quotation is one of the copyright exceptions provided by the Berne Convention, article 10: "It shall be permissible to make quotations ... provided that their making is compatible with fair practice, and their extent does not exceed that justified by the purpose". Always give credit to the source of (portions of) text. There are examples where a particular sound has been ruled to warrant protection as a trade mark ("that familiar Rumble", Harley-Davidson) and, to my knowledge in a Dutch court case concerning artistic rights, the timbre in Elvis' voice.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • List
  12. Smoove Grooves

    Smoove Grooves Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2019
    Messages:
    5,184
    Likes Received:
    1,960
    Which, unrelated to the recordings of any such public-airing of the speech, would at least imply we can quote the text IN text, but re-record that quote and use it in a recording...? I doubt.
    Doesn't meant the quote can be the recorded speech though! :winker:
     
  13. Smoove Grooves

    Smoove Grooves Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2019
    Messages:
    5,184
    Likes Received:
    1,960
    Well, wherever you are geographically, YMMV.
    Yet considering the YT algo blocked a purely educational uni lecture on the history of Hip Hop just for some James Brown samples...through a crap Tannoy system in a uni lesson with noisey talking students around 10 years ago, I really don't know what to expect now.
    I mean, look at what happened to Rick Beato on YT.
    The majors and/or the artists didn't care about 'educational use', but YT would have found it for the them first and offered them the option to shut it down.
    Really, educational use originally probably meant in a classroom and not with a publically replayable recording of said lecture! lol
     
  14. Obineg

    Obineg Platinum Record

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2020
    Messages:
    739
    Likes Received:
    260
    depending on the country you are in, there is a good chance that such material is copyrighted, too.

    however, in practice it is mostly other legal circles which can be affected from things like that.

    for example using the voice theoretically requries the approval of the person, or can violate his personality rights, because the original recording already did.

    then the person who was holding the microphone or a press agency or newspaper company might have ancillary copyrights (which is, at least here in europe a completely different story from the protection laws)

    if the person who speaks did that on behalf of a third party he also migt have ancillary copyrights and wants to get payments per word or per minute in case your reuse includes broadcasting it again.

    lasty, of course the text itself could be a copyrighted works.


    a closer exam would only be possible for a concrete use case.

    finding out about all these things by simply asking at a single point is unfortunately not so easy.

    as you know, copyrights´n stuff is not depending on membership in a collecting society, and every second youtube news channel mostly steals material from others.

    and it always remains your own responsibility to have everything cleared with the rightholder, anyway.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Interesting Interesting x 1
    • List
  15. The Pirate

    The Pirate Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2018
    Messages:
    5,186
    Likes Received:
    4,405
    Location:
    NOYMFB
  16. Smoove Grooves

    Smoove Grooves Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2019
    Messages:
    5,184
    Likes Received:
    1,960
    Good. I said I wasn't an expert and there are so many variables of usage case, in different continents, across different reproduction mediums, that I just wanted to illustrate the amount of variables.
    I could have chosen other examples obviously.

    You've actually helped with the actual question in the op though, re. Jobs, which I didn't feel like addressing!
    I chose to do some weeding as well...
     
  17. The Pirate

    The Pirate Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2018
    Messages:
    5,186
    Likes Received:
    4,405
    Location:
    NOYMFB
    That is the fallacy of copyright questions that start with the "let us imagine." It is the person's who posits it fault by not being specific enough. Lawyers don't want to hear "let us imagine", they want facts in order to apply the law, and provide you with a sound course of action. With that said, I was not referring to you, specifically, but to the person who mention the 10-seconds-myth. There is not such a thing as a free for all if you use 10 seconds or less of a sound recording. None!
     
  18. Smoove Grooves

    Smoove Grooves Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2019
    Messages:
    5,184
    Likes Received:
    1,960
    @ the thread starter, much as I like to be level with No Avenger in the Best Answers list, @The Pirate should actually get Best Answer as he actually gave you your information that you specifically needed. I just chose to talk about random examples because of some of the things you were thinking.
    And if others want to sample SJ and use it in a song and they look for such a thread or happen to see it, his info is of more use than mine.
     
Loading...
Similar Threads - question copyright Forum Date
samples, chords, and copyright related issues - few questions Working with Sound Jun 16, 2019
Question about sampling copyrighted sounds. Lounge Dec 16, 2017
Sports Streaming Apps Question Lounge Jul 21, 2024
Genuine Question about selling FabFilter plugins Software Jul 19, 2024
chord progression question Education Jul 5, 2024
Loading...