What do you think about launching a challenge and everyone says a sentence or something that no one can go against it?

I think there is no such thing in human life. Because anything that a person strongly believes in, can be violated by thinking more and giving some other conflicting reasons.

 

maybe, yes and no, perhaps.

 

We have art in order not to die of the truth
Nietzsche

 

Humans cannot breathe pure carbon monoxide. I can do this all day if you want.

 

you can't walk on the sun.

 

Huh?

 

pussy tastes better when there not related.

 

About five minutes is fine man, no need to go and set yourself up for failure.

 

The sun will rise and set tomorrow and every day thereafter until it explodes or dies.

 

Quite right.

 

Last edited by a moderator: Sep 16, 2020

This sentence is false

 

it was your idea not mine, dont start a recruiting angle!
cmon do you wanna split hairs or breathe monoxide? clock is ticking

Ill stick to my nitrous oxide, you can keep your manky c monoxide its not pure, food grade? more like BBQ grade

 

And here ladies and gentlemen, we have the perfect example of why the original question is untrue. Next he will tell us how you can walk on the Sun.

 

My mistake. Nothing to see here.

 

Last edited by a moderator: Sep 16, 2020

Guys, I think this time-related comment:

prompted this time-related answer:

Has there not been a slight misunderstanding of words on the interwebs?
I know it would be a first, but...

 

Everything I say and write is a lie.

 

I hadn't picked up on that. Now I feel stupid. You can't argue about my stupidity.

 

Just bringing those lovely classic 'logical conundrum' examples into the context of the question...

"This statement can be opposed"
go on - try to oppose it

 

Last edited: Sep 16, 2020

The philosopher's classic is Descartes' "Cogito, ergo Sum" - "I think therefore I am"

Not to be stupidly confused with believing that thinking causes you to exist!

Interpret as "Given that I'm thinking, I obviously must exist"
It's meant to establish that 'everything else' is in principle subject to doubt (no matter how small that doubt).
(even if you're a prisoner in the matrix and everything is false - you're still thinking)

Modern update (from philosophy and cognitive psychology) would regard the "I' as just more doubtable superfluous baggage.

So reduce it to "Thoughts exist"
and then you're still left with a bloody huge problem of providing a robust explanation of what 'exists' means.