Hello my friends and esteemed members of the resort and recreation section of AS.

I wanted to ask everyone a question. Do you think the DAW makers listen to their customers or just do their jobs?

Many people have made many requests to upgrade or create new parts in their using DAWs, but what seems to be the case is that developers usually do not listen to them and pursue any goal that they have in relation to selling more of their products.

If you look closely at the changes in DAWs, you will notice that no special features are added to them and mostly some bugs are fixed. Of course, this is my opinion. Now if you have another opinion, we will be happy to hear them. People have had many complaints about the DAWs, but unfortunately there is no court to deal with these complaints.

• Wouldn't it be better "a new subdivision in the international courts" is created to deal with these matters?

Thanks for your green presence in this discussion.

 

Don't mean to be rude but...what the heck are you talking about?!
Wouldn't even know where to start there's so much nonsense in that post.

 

Are you working for one of them?

 

YES! And you should be appointed as its Chief Justice. Nice to have you in this forum Chief Justice Nought.

 

This is a complete waste of a post.

When any product, be it software, a car, a t-shirt, a TV or heck, a vibrator or what ever consumers have a choice, you buy it or you do not.

Any manufacturer has no reason to listen to anyone if they so chose not to and it is certainly not anything that any "court" can deal with.

The answer is simple. if you do not like a DAW then do not buy it - if you do not like a warezed DAW then grow up and shut up.

 

If you "buy" a daw you are entitled to use it as is and there is no right to complain about anything.

 

send me half of what your smokin please

 

If Foster buys a daw he should put a handle on it

 

Last edited: Jul 18, 2020

I know this drill.

Just FYI guys @Nought (former Foster, banned many times now) is a provoker-style troll.
He creates threads pretending to ask a question just to answer himself in a polemic way to provoke arguments between us.
Talking shit like: music is dead, jazz is now crap. This time with DAWs.

He even said that's his opinion. It's a first, probably to delay the eventual ban again.

 

Last edited: Jul 18, 2020

"Opinion is like having an ass hole, we all have one"

 

We need a court of spectrum analysis, where punishments get compressed, plea deals get expanded, prison sentences get their tail gated, and where the accused are handcuffed on the side chain.

 

Get me an 800$ Juce license and I'll start developing one for you .When the development is complete we can sell it together

 

stay away, it seems to be very bad quality!!!

 

....and many opinions like assholes, stink.

 

Let me tell you what I know about the historicity of the matter as is pertains in a direct or sometimes an indirect manner to the issue of the current or contemporaneous digital audio workstation. In my days a rather clever fellow by the name of Edison created the first DAW. With it he was able to send messages from the bathroom on a waxed cylinder onto which he had recorded his voice speaking the words "we're out of toilet paper" In a flash of blinding inspiration he connected four of his machines together and recorded his voice saying the words " Number 9, Number 9, Number 9"...It eventually was released on the Beatles White Album. After his passing, he had a brief affair with Wendy Carlos who was so traumatised she briefly reverted to Walter and joined the band Styx. At the end of a concert at the Royal Albert Hall, having been booed off for using a VST of a Moog Modular, Walter became Wendy once more and joined a troupe of trapeze artists who painted watercolours of jugglers with feathers. They were last seen in Helsinki building a light rail system which had no council approval. A judge ruled them to be "utter idiots" and that my friend is how we have the modern DAW.

 

@Nought. In defense of your somewhat muddled case for litigation, your argument requires presentation of factual evidence. For example,

a.) Precisely how many people have made the requests that are alleged in your statement above?

b.) How many requests were made by those persons?

c.) What is the true number of alleged requests that are/were currently ignored by DAW developers?

d.) Explain to us how developers raise capital in order to pay their workers.

e.) Cite your sources of information and the steps you took in due diligence to verify the accuracy of your report.

 

I know I shouldn't be lured into this silliness, but I'd say 99% of the time your DAW is acting up it's PEBCAK.

 

My nutsack is all wrinkly.
I am not sure that fully answers your question, but I figured I'd better let you know.


















Of course it is subject to change.
When it is warm it's smooth and dangly.
So sue me.

 

If you ever write a novel I'm buying it no questions asked

 

You belong to the loop generation. The most you can expect from DAWs is that they can help you mix the awkward sounds you make with ...., ...., ...., .... . Yes, they can handle this well.

You do not have to take a stand against me now. Better not to leave your cherished DAW alone. Go to it and caress it. It really needs you.