This

 

As we say with us "Chance on the back"

Comme on dit chez nous " Le hasard à bon dos "

 

Why are u asking?
Do u "feel" like our answers will help u in anyway?
Cos i "feel" like u have already made up your mind.

What's the actual problem here? Anything solvable?

 

Oh, my dear, amen to this, but what worries me most is the ideology that is behind the question asked by OP in the poll...

 

 

Last edited: May 6, 2020

It is not unusual for people to ask questions here without subsequently participating in the discussion seriously.
They probably have no real interest in clarifying their matter.
The op poses a question (poll) or claim into the room and observes the reaction of the participants from the distance in a voyeuristic way.
That satisfies his stunted need for interaction.
This behavior is known as TROLLISM in science, a particularly serious form of this disability is called FOSTERRHEA.

 

Last edited: May 6, 2020

Trying towards more focus.. while fleeing from random running's around in roulette flip :P

 

I don't know where to start. Please let's take this one more seriously.

We face different phenomena in life. Unlike other creatures, humans are very interested in understanding and controlling these phenomena so that they can use them to their advantage at different times. Phenomena can be simple or complex. Simple phenomena are easy to understand and format and also to use, but complex phenomena require more time and thought.

Music is one of those phenomena that can be viewed simplistically and also can be considered with a deeper view. In a deeper perspective, various parameters are proposed that the effect of each of which is not easily identifiable. If the music maker spends more time and pondering, it's more likely that he or she will better understand the impact of those parameters and move away from the random mode. Music, or anything that is hidden from the human eye, is more likely to be accidentally misunderstood and misused.

In the case of other art disciplines, such as film-making or other scientific ones, the risk of accident is considerably reduced. Rarely an accident can occur and a work of visual art be created. The same for scientific products such as vaccine.

But what about music?

 

Dayum. I wish I'd known that forty years ago when I became a professional film & television Producer/Director. Instead of benefiting from such well-informed and illustrious insights, I had to work my arse off for my Academy Awards nomination.

Or maybe not, eh?

 

Here music makes You!

 

I'm going to start a poll called "do you spend more time analyzing and trying to be philosophical about making music than you do actually making music?"

 

I'm starting to think that George Lucas has too much time, money and ranches on his hands!

Spoiler

Avatar checks out >____>

 

yes. but also no.

 

Shame on you... I should talk with your mom.

Spoiler

 

cant ignore a happy accident when it smacks me in the face :D

 

Chaotic sessions are the most fun but rarely they lead by themselves, to a final track.
They can be used to create elements for a formal project and to release any stress.
They also help your brain muscle a new way of doing things; that can later become a new methodology, in the logical brain.

 

One of the reasons I oppose the use of accident in music is that accidental work is usually short. Its musical content can rarely reach more than 30 seconds. You can't make 30-minute work by accident.

When an accident is used in music, the maker's ability to manage different parts of it is drastically reduced. The main reason why pop, rock, electronic music and such is less than 4 minutes is because the creator has used accident and is not able to increase its length due to not being fully aware what's going on in his music.

The basis of most genres of music today is accident, and the creator cannot make anything without using accident. If we force the creator not to use the accident, he will never be able to do anything.

 

A work created by accident never becomes a methodology. Accidental work joins history, and everyone will forget what its name was, let alone using it to build the future works.

 

accidents? vaccine? VACCINE?