Midi 2.0 ?

Discussion in 'Industry News' started by 30hz, Feb 12, 2019.

  1. metaller

    metaller Audiosexual

    Joined:
    May 28, 2016
    Messages:
    778
    Likes Received:
    542
    Location:
    Persia
    Besides the size, I am sad for Spitfire sampler guys, sampling those 4 billion layers. :(
     
  2. No Avenger

    No Avenger Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2017
    Messages:
    9,117
    Likes Received:
    6,353
    Location:
    Europe
    Don't know if this is DAW-dependent (and I don't think so) but last time I checked some pitch values in an editor, there were + - values and a 0 for no change...
    AFAIK pitch is transmitted with MSB and LSB and therefore has 127*127 values of which one half is positive and the other negative. So there is a standard zero.
     
  3. No Avenger

    No Avenger Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2017
    Messages:
    9,117
    Likes Received:
    6,353
    Location:
    Europe
    :rofl:
     
  4. No Avenger

    No Avenger Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2017
    Messages:
    9,117
    Likes Received:
    6,353
    Location:
    Europe
    This is due to a bad controller or some concussions while playing.
     
  5. famouslut

    famouslut Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2015
    Messages:
    1,420
    Likes Received:
    929
    :D I think it has to do w/ pitch bend range and separate pitch bend sensitivity. Maybe?
    You can have PB that will let you bend (usually) +- a semitone (+- 8192 @ 14 bits) or something else entirely depending on random chance. It seems. I dunno. I don't wanna get into a whole MMJ thingy about it, but I hope they standardize it.
     
  6. mild pump milk

    mild pump milk Russian Milk Drunkard

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2014
    Messages:
    2,788
    Likes Received:
    2,380
    Location:
    Russia
    Yeah... Every library will be ended in 2119 or later. Not coming soon! Good news for our grandsons' grandsons! It is so because of midi 2.0
     
  7. No Avenger

    No Avenger Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2017
    Messages:
    9,117
    Likes Received:
    6,353
    Location:
    Europe
    Ha, this is correct, 127*127 was wrong. :facepalm: Thanks.

    That's a good thing. :yes:

    Well, don't know, I played keys for years and still use a master keyboard to play everything and never had any big issues with faulty PB values...
    Let's wait and see how they mess it up this time. [​IMG]
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
    • Like Like x 1
    • List
  8. Gyro Gearloose

    Gyro Gearloose Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2019
    Messages:
    4,234
    Likes Received:
    1,849
    Location:
    Germany
    i wait for midi3
     
    • Funny Funny x 3
    • Like Like x 2
    • List
  9. famouslut

    famouslut Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2015
    Messages:
    1,420
    Likes Received:
    929
    I mean, I don't rly know much about MIDI, my lovely tigery friend, but I know that PB (sometimes) & automation (all times) rly are the two big things that screw up. I just hope it gets fixed! It's weird and spooky how consistently and unconciously I can hit a 64 velocity all the damn time, which feels rly wrong given my ineptitude! There needs to be more accuracy than that!
     
  10. No Avenger

    No Avenger Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2017
    Messages:
    9,117
    Likes Received:
    6,353
    Location:
    Europe
    Ever saw a tiger blushing? :winker:

    You should see how consistently and unconciously I can easily hit a different velocity all the time, that's really impressive. [​IMG]

    But you're right, 127 steps are just not enough for an expressive performance.
     
    • Like Like x 2
    • Funny Funny x 1
    • List
  11. mild pump milk

    mild pump milk Russian Milk Drunkard

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2014
    Messages:
    2,788
    Likes Received:
    2,380
    Location:
    Russia
    MIDI 2.0 development discontinued? Or it will be announced to be released in 2029?
    )
     
  12. Xupito

    Xupito Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2012
    Messages:
    7,307
    Likes Received:
    4,052
    Location:
    Europe
    They already did it!! :crazy:
    We're prophets!!! :rofl:

    "Get BBC Symphony Orchestra delivered to you on our new 1TB SSD for fast, instant playability."
     
    • Funny Funny x 2
    • Interesting Interesting x 1
    • List
  13. [​IMG]

    Dave Smith of Instruments fame. One of the creators of MIDI. Thirty seven years later, we're still at Version 1.0.

    While you're waiting for the next version, don't hold your breath.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • List
  14. orbitbooster

    orbitbooster Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2018
    Messages:
    1,134
    Likes Received:
    639
    Hoping that it will be really backward compatible, I think it's a good thing. Improved velocity dynamics is great for pianos, and it gets nearer to advanced instrument standards like the AvantGrand.

    Also, while I understand that anyone is rightly worried about the huge sample libraries that could follow to this new protocol (they're already too fat for my taste), I believe that physical modeling is going to take over samples (it will take a while, though).
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • List
  15. Xupito

    Xupito Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2012
    Messages:
    7,307
    Likes Received:
    4,052
    Location:
    Europe
    I'm afraid when they finally implement MIDI 2.0 this fine gentleman will be holding breath... eternally...:rofl:
     
Loading...
Similar Threads - Midi Forum Date
Extracting mididb from EZDrummer PC Dec 16, 2024
Importing MIDI into FamiTracker v0.4.2 problem Software Dec 13, 2024
Midi CC problem on Bitwig Studio 5.2 Mac / Hackintosh Dec 12, 2024
MIDI Thru box with SysEx support Soundgear Dec 1, 2024
How to map midi buttons inside studio one? Studio One Nov 27, 2024
Loading...