In the last week I been seeing old releases outnumbering the new releases on Audioz. I have no say in how that site is run but I want to know why the change in policy, or what others think. So I am polling. Thanks to everyone for upping stuff, but it gets confusing with old dupes outnumbering new stuff. I suggest for old releases one uses a torrent search engine like torrentz.eu . Okay, over and out.

 

Evesixtynine Great idea! *yes*

I think the old stuff should have betweeen parentesis = "old release" "re-up" "reissue" or something else, letting people know that this is not a new release. The other day I saw a poor guy asking what was new with Abbey Road plugs 1.1 unaware that it was a 2010 release.

And yes, have two sections for the new and the old. That would solve the problem! *yes* *yes* *yes*

 

I think re-ups should still be on the front page but I agree they should be clearly identified! Many of them are probably responses to requests or reports of dead posts..

Torrents are not a good alternative to a well maintained Audioz.

 

Are re-ups on the front page like? Didn't think they were I also thought re-ups were dated so you knew that they were. Anyway, its good to have them and I find them very useful!

 

Not too sure actually, I just watch the RSS feed..