To Raid or not to Raid?

Discussion in 'Mac / Hackintosh' started by signalflow, Oct 12, 2016.

  1. signalflow

    signalflow Rock Star

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2016
    Messages:
    681
    Likes Received:
    364
    Location:
    Los Angeles, CA
    Are any of you doing a Raid 1 or 0 with your system?


    If you are doing a Raid 0 with your system, do you see any real performance gains?

    My current system is configured this way with no Raid:
    Drive bay 1: system
    Drive bay 2: sample library
    Drive bay 3: Kontakt library
    Drive bay 4: project files / downloads


    Is there a more optimal way to see performance gain?
     
  2. midi-man

    midi-man Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2013
    Messages:
    1,650
    Likes Received:
    820
    Not on my pc but on my NAS's Raid 5.
     
  3. ovalf

    ovalf Platinum Record

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2012
    Messages:
    897
    Likes Received:
    217
    Location:
    Brazil
    raid 0 its too risky, only worth if you will use large libs.
    FIRST: where is your backups?
    I have 2 raid 5 on my main computer, one with 4 and other with 6 disks + backups.
     
    Last edited: Oct 13, 2016
  4. jayxflash

    jayxflash Guest

    Drive bay 1: SSD system
    Drive bay 2: HDD sample library
    Drive bay 3: SSD/HDD Kontakt library
    Drive bay 4: HDD project files / downloads

    ...all drives should have a form of backup (cloud, NAS or at least some 2.5" TB drives)
     
  5. signalflow

    signalflow Rock Star

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2016
    Messages:
    681
    Likes Received:
    364
    Location:
    Los Angeles, CA
    Sweet. thanks for the advise. I'll have to wait on this option until I find some more money
     
  6. midi-man

    midi-man Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2013
    Messages:
    1,650
    Likes Received:
    820
    Drive Bay 1 SSD.
    NAS Raid 5 everything else min 3 drives.
     
  7. fiction

    fiction Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    1,940
    Likes Received:
    706
    Any RAID will boost data transfer rate but not really improve access times.
    That's especially relevant if you're using conventional hard drives in the array.
    Because sample libraries usually contain many small files, you will most likely see more performance gain by using an SSD.
    Even if you have large .NKX sample files, access times matter because depending on what notes you play at what velocity, multiple randomly positioned sections inside the .NKX file have to be accessed.
    A RAID is certainly great for backup purposes and applications where large sequential chunks of data have to be read or written.
    Make sure you use bulletproof RAID software (or hardware), I have seen RAID arrays fail more than once due to bugs in the rebuild procedure or bugs in the detection of faulty drives.

    Using RAID Level 0 is, sorry, plain stupid imho. If you don't want your data to be lost, you surely don't want to increase the probability of a complete RAID failure.
    You could either add another drive and build a RAID5 with 3 drives, or put two RAID1 mirrors into a RAID0, but with 4 disk drives you're better off with RAID5 anyway.

    I hope my little essay wasn't too puzzling :crazy:
     
  8. ovalf

    ovalf Platinum Record

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2012
    Messages:
    897
    Likes Received:
    217
    Location:
    Brazil
    another thing is what kind of raid.
    From your board: not a really a real raid, poor performance and security (tested but never used)
    real Hardware raid: (have one) the real beast, with a fast ram is insane. My old satas (pre hybrid with ssds) in raid 5 with 6 disks (one is redundant) read at 737 mbs/second (half for backup and kontakt)... this is juslt an old LSI sata 1 with 256mb of ram... 20 bucks in ebay.
    Software: there are great ones, i use Softraid for OS X. with 4 new hybrid disk with raid 5 (one is redundant) I got 370 mbs/sec. With a real hardware probably I can get around 600 mbs/sec or more (half for vsts and half for back up-really fast backups)
     
Loading...
Loading...