Universal Audio UAD-2 Powered Plug-Ins Full cracked!
http://idontspamthesite/34408-unive...-plug-ins-full-cracked-mac-win-team-fish.html

Incredible but true: these folks post everything without checking its content.
They took one of my old APRIL FOOLS DAY posts and published it right away...

...VIP ONLY! 1.87 MB – Haaahahahahaaahaa!!
Team FiSh|April 1-2014
You can dream about it!

 

Last edited by a moderator: Sep 27, 2019

If its a joke,how come im testing the cracked UAD-2 suit right now?Thanks V.R!

 

huh?

 

suhh dude

 

It's pitiful. It's as low as the guys who create new posts/releases , on audioz, for FREEWARE apps, to which there are free links provided by the developer/website. And they call it 'new releases'.

ah, money!

though, the guys at UAD must have versions of their plug-ins that RUN on standard x86 platforms, and probably, they run much faster on old I7 3770k or I5 2500k cpus than on their cheapo dsp processors, as they have chosen to work with some of the least expensive and least powerful shark DSPs. That's why there are some uad plug-ins where a single stereo instance will DESTROY an OCTO card. Even more, when uad lie to their (future) customers about the cards instance count, by using as reference 44.1Khz 16bit, when most pros will be using AT LEAST 96Khz 24bit quality. LOL at the guys who pay 1700 euros for an octo card, to find out there are a few plug-ins that they might only use ONCE.

I wish uad could tell us if their dsp cards got chosen because they offer more power than a fast cup, or because they can use it as a huge hardware dongle. But I guess the 2nd choice is good.

because for the price people are paying, and what those dsps do cost, the dsp cards should have 2 or 3 times more chips. A quad should have 8 or 12 dsps, an octo, 16 or 24.. and they would still be making tons of cash, from each card sold.

the dsp models they've chosen aren't among the slowest/less powerful ones. Why nobody wonder why they only have plug-ins, but NO SYNTHS? Because their engineers could easily 100% model some classic synths, just like Arturia does. Why aren't they doing that? Because then, people could really have an idea how powerful /slow their dsp are. Because a diva -like synths would only get 3 or 4 notes polyphony on an octo card, that would not be a great advertising.

and because they must have plug-in versions that can run on Intel cpus, maybe there could be some sort of leak, like a former employe...
who knows ?

 

3-04-2014... time to move on.
Are we still nowhere with elicenser on a MAC?

 

Last edited: May 25, 2016

Yeah, good question! How comes?

 

It comes simply... V.R forgets his medication and goes on to crack Cubase,Universal Audio , Pro Tools, sometimes he mistakes delusions, induced by not taking his medications, for reality and releases it, case in point: Scuffham Amps S-GEAR....
I beta test V.R's NASA logins right now......... so I've told him, just to keep him calm....

 

Oh I see. So they in fact cracked a joke but it's stuck in testing!

 

hello, fellow universal audio gear users , fellow audio love makers too ,

there exists no known way in the present protocol where any plug-in could use more than one chip, for the time being.

assumption waves again then again?

bests, as always, for all of us...

 

Last edited: May 25, 2016

You can bake the UAD soft code on an Audigy 2 card and use it externally with your 2nd pc and your main rig,all you need is an iron solder.

 

ooooops...

sorry, did not foresee this solution, of course will try it right now on...

just my immensely terrible dread that one of those nasty stereo instances will fry the whole rig, even still perchance the mains, that is what stops me right here.

many grateful thanks for this, wish all of us the best of the best...

 

Last edited: May 25, 2016

Ex:
Instances count mono/stereo. At 44.1 16bit. Solo Duo Quad Octo
Manley Massive Passive EQ (STD & MST) 37.1% 60.2% 2 /1 4/ 2 8/4 16/8

@48khz 24bit, we can easily divide those numbers by 2.

which means a user might be lucky if he can open 4 or 5 stereo instances, on an octo card. 4 or 5.

unless you tell me the uad code can't access 2 dsps at once...

Anyway , 8 stereo instances max on an octo 1700 euros card... that's a little too much, for me.
Anyway, at 300-400 euros each plug, these cards are definitely sold for the studio owners, or a few other guys who can spend 2000 euros per week.

and will those pros work or protools, at 44khz 16bit ? Lol, UAD, LOL @ your instance chart.

 

Not true....
One the plugin not cost that price because UAD make coupon monthly .. For me each plug i buy cost between 50 and 150 euros not more
Two i have plugin that you speak and i have more instance than you speak...
So conclusion : let's talk UAD by uad user it's more serious and more true
you have the general speech of someone who doesn't own.... one more time.... So talk about what you know and not more please....

 

instead of something humorous, my bad, me knows...

that is the way the plug-ins work, at least at the present, thus that is what is stated in my post, nothing to do with instance count statistics.

thus, there is no chance for any plug-in, even if in that verily dreaded stereo instance form, for being capable to destroy duo, quad, octo, cards.

to be better explained, the code of every plug-in can use only one sharc chip, but one dsp chip might be used by more plug-ins, all this might be caused by data traffic restrictions or rather simplifications in their routing solution, better ask around about this at their user forum, if this is not enough demonstratively convincing.

bests, for all of us, as always, plus now we can laugh out loudly about all those stooopid developers who are incapable to write better code...

 

Last edited: May 25, 2016

Don't forget about Team BeFuddlerz's UVI Falcon FULL CRACKED.

 

it's a joke inside rar only jpg of UAD plugin ... Plugin without dsp card it's not possible ... so don't waiting a good news on this side and don't pay anything it's just impossible....

 

Awesome name!! Reminds me of Rudy Ray Moore's "Signifying Monkey" Lol

 

I remember that joke. It was a good one and it fooled the whole forum for a few Hours. Its continuing to draw attention after this long proves how good a joke it was.

The funny thing now is the new versus fight in the forums:

"PC vs Mac", a classic
"Pro Tools vs the world", a horse we've beat a lot already, and when the dust seems to be settling,
"UAD vs the world."

 

indeed, plus bullshitting is in the same league too