How to Get a Big - Wide Vocal Sound

Discussion in 'Working with Sound' started by simpler, Apr 16, 2015.

  1. simpler

    simpler Newbie

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2015
    Messages:
    30
    Likes Received:
    2
    A tiny article on how to get that fat vocal sound

    http://www.rastsound.com/how-to-get-a-big-wide-vocal-sound/
     
  2.  
  3. One Reason

    One Reason Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2011
    Messages:
    2,764
    Likes Received:
    795
    Location:
    Where I dont want to be
    I always just try to sing fatter... wider..

    Its a good starting point :rofl:
     
  4. ovalf

    ovalf Platinum Record

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2012
    Messages:
    897
    Likes Received:
    217
    Location:
    Brazil
    the tiniest article about I ever found! :wow:
    Lets read more!
    Also here we find a lot more than that :wink: *yes*
    THERES GOLD HERE :bleh:
     
  5. simpler

    simpler Newbie

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2015
    Messages:
    30
    Likes Received:
    2
    maybe less is more :bow:
    these 3 tips make it all.
     
  6. Baxter

    Baxter Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2011
    Messages:
    3,933
    Likes Received:
    2,778
    Location:
    Sweden
    Lol! That was kind of funny. The techniques explained didn't have the correct terms - like double-tracking, Haas effect, chorus, etc. There is also no explanation WHY you get a wide/big/spatial sound.

    "Parallel" was misspelled. You misspelled "An tiny article".

    I'm glad I already know how to make wide/big vocals. Kids of today don't have it easy with all these "How,-but-not-why-you-do-it" tutorials. ;)
     
  7. simpler

    simpler Newbie

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2015
    Messages:
    30
    Likes Received:
    2
    Hahahaha, this was really funny. :rofl:
    Correct terms for who, please search a little before writing a reply.
    You may read this source article below on audio decorrelation from Vaggione.
    And I believe you are just a pure crystal my friend, you don't misspell anything,
    Please think just a little before spitting on people.

    http://www.csis.ul.ie/dafx01/proceedings/papers/Addendum1%20-%20Vaggione.pdf
     
  8. studio5599

    studio5599 Producer

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2011
    Messages:
    987
    Likes Received:
    92
    Thats it Whoo I'm Pro now, i finally figured out how to make a big fat vocal thanks to rast sounds is that one of those sights charge 29.99 for hidden secrets on recording vocals? :rofl:

    Sorry friend though Lamo
     
  9. One Reason

    One Reason Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2011
    Messages:
    2,764
    Likes Received:
    795
    Location:
    Where I dont want to be
    Sights??... Lamo

    :rofl:
     
  10. Baxter

    Baxter Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2011
    Messages:
    3,933
    Likes Received:
    2,778
    Location:
    Sweden
    There are correct terms for alot of effects, often named by the original inventors. Many of which have been around for a very long time (Doppler in the 1840's, Blumlein in the 1930's, Haas in the 1950's, double-tracking (or multi-dubbing) with the "wall-of-sound" in the 1960's, HRTF in the 70's and 80's, binaural recordings, etc etc).
    The Haas effect also introduces comb filtering when summed to mono, which might have negative effect on such a prominent instrument as the vocal.
    I don't need to search, as I already know these things.

    That's just basics of what Haas did in the 50's. Nothing new here.

    Yes, I am a snowflake and I always have correct spelling. ;)
    I'm not spitting on people - I'm merely correcting errors and speaking my mind.
     
Loading...
Loading...