It seem legal and innovative to bring out the vintage vinyl in the modern audio or will it definitely sound better than VST plugin?

[media]https://d2pq0u4uni88oo.cloudfront.net/projects/1383378/video-479876-h264_high.mp4[/media]

http://kck.st/14a6qn4

 

Plenty of plugs replicate the old vinyl sound

 

http://www.alessandroboschi.eu/html/alexb/vnl_vinylizer.htm

Once I tried this I stopped looking though it's not for everyone, so I'd find no need really

 

that makes me laugh, obviously the company who made it posting that.

1) Vinyl is still around.

2) diagrams showing phone plugged into this DAC then into stereo

HEY WE CAN MAKE YOUR MP3 SOUND WORSE.

when you know you could play a CD through your stereo and it'll sound 100x better.

3) the 'science' is showing a huge increase at 10hz

Yay thats exactly what we need. no.

4) the frequency range is 2 - 200kHz

well, i'm not a whale so i don't need to hear that high although that'll just start a debate just like is 192khz better to record.

many arguments for yes many arguments for no.

5) "Modern audio equipment only delivers audio within a flat and narrow range of tones"

not really true, most hi-fi's unless you're paying premium tend to have a high bass increase and a high top end increase with a huge dip in the mids

imagine a smiley face on an EQ not really flat is it.





end of the day

it's just an amplifier with a tone knob.

bit of a rant but don't call it vinyl.


vinyl is vinyl.

 

Erm, no, I'm not that guy, I'm Singaporean.

Interesting.

1) Yes, vinyl still around, I can't afford to get some music without the vinyl edition.

2) Nope, you heard PureVinyl for iPhone?

when you know you could play a CD through your stereo and it'll sound 100x better.
> I listened to CD directly from CD-ROM in the 90s, definitely the great sound I've ever enjoyed, it was Creative product in Singapore and was a popular local brand too.

3) the 'science' is showing a huge increase at 10hz
Yay thats exactly what we need. no.
> Don't get the idea here.

4) the frequency range is 2 - 200kHz
well, i'm not a whale so i don't need to hear that high although that'll just start a debate just like is 192khz better to record.
many arguments for yes many arguments for no.
> I would get Bluray but not allow titles are available.

 

I laughed...and I needed a laugh.

 

Correction: PureVinyl for Mac. Who tried it?

 

Useful demo!

 

When I was djing out after ever set I played from 2005-2010, Someone always came up said why is the bass so deep. I'ld reply that because I'm still using Vinyl not wav or mp3's

the I kids today are being robbed of frequencies and they don't even know it

As in life most they got things right first time round.

@ rickbarratt
the frequency range is 2 - 200kHz
well, i'm not a whale so i don't need to hear that high although that'll just start a debate just like is 192khz better to record.

Its all about the roll off

And as for cds sounding better. I take you got a "Alba system and I don't mean Jessica" By Strategy of Broke 'n' £nglish.

big up DRS & Strategy
both lyrical blades telling it how it is