Upgrade from UMC204HD...

Discussion in 'Soundgear' started by lePureStyle, Apr 24, 2026 at 6:53 PM.

  1. lePureStyle

    lePureStyle Newbie

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2026
    Messages:
    4
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    France
    Hello, I have managed to get a (very) little desk in the living room of our flat (tough Wife Acceptance Factor here), to have some fun doing some music on my rare spare time.

    I'm currently planning the 2026-2027 budget, and this includes tiny monitors, and audio-interface upgrade.

    There's absolutely no chance to ever get the room treated, so I'm left with Headphones mixing which I'm doing on the recently acquired DT 900 Pro X with Headphone Lab. Next on the list are Adam D3V (white to respect the WAF) which I'm about to order, as sometimes it's nice to listen to music not through headphones only.

    [​IMG]

    Now as you can see on the picture, the audio interface is the Behringer UMC204HD, and I'm considering a move to :
    - Golden Age PRE-73 Premier + RME Digiface USB + Ferrofish Pulse8 AE
    or
    - Neve 88M + Ferrofish Pulse8 AE

    The main "externally" recorded materials are my voice via a SM57 and the Behringer Pro-1 via line input. Also I have some pedals that are daisy chained. Everything else is software based.

    The goal is, despite the untreated room, to have a vocal recording with very little to no EQ needed, and multiple converters for the pedals as I/O in Logic Pro.

    My musical style is in between New Order, D Train, Harold Faltermeyer, Kashif and Wham!

    Maybe you'd think why would I need to upgrade to pro level gear, well it's a hobby, a passion... :)

    Thanks for reading
     

    Attached Files:

  2.  
  3. shinjiya

    shinjiya Rock Star

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2018
    Messages:
    718
    Likes Received:
    470
    I would just get one of the appropriately sized (for your needs) Audient ID interfaces and call it a day. Doesn't get any better than that and everything else is just a sidegrade for more money.
     
  4. PulseWave

    PulseWave Audiosexual

    Joined:
    May 4, 2025
    Messages:
    5,133
    Likes Received:
    2,998
    Hi @lePureStyle, this device helps you make reasonably usable vocal recordings in an untreated room.
    The t.bone Micscreen XL can be mounted on any standard microphone stand using a simple thread.


    the t.bone Micscreen X
    L - €79 --> www.thomann.de/de/the_t.bone_micscreen_xl.htm?offid=1&affid=1571

    Absorber and diffuser for microphones
    • Reduces the transmission of unwanted room influences such as reflections, background noise, and echoes through the microphone
    • Portable and equally suitable for studio and live applications, vocals, and instrument recording
    • The screen's 5 segments can be folded and unfolded in various positions, allowing it to be easily adapted to the recording situation
    • Can be mounted on any standard microphone stand or placed directly on a tabletop without a stand
    • Width: 16 - 80 cm (each segment is 16 cm wide)
    • Height: 32 cm
    • Weight: approx. 2.70 kg
     
  5. sisyphus

    sisyphus Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2014
    Messages:
    1,758
    Likes Received:
    761
    Yeah, a decade or so ago I got a Reflexion Filter Pro or whatever they call it, and it absolutely helped in recording vocals in untreated rooms, in addition to acoustic guitars and other things.

    They don't solve all, but solve some.

    (and I'm sure @lePureStyle 's wife isn't going to go for full room treatment or a Whisper Room installation!)

    But cool little working setup you got going on there.

    At least you can probably sell the missus on the Adam's as she can enjoy listening to music etc on them as well (not yours all the time!)).

    Re: the RME, it's a great unit, but with a Mac, and it's drivers, if you are trying to stay on a budget, I honestly don't think you will notice any sonic difference or discernible latency with, say, a Mark of the Unicorn M4 (motu supports their drivers forever, it's a solid unit, good for the external inputs and loopback you want for your pedals and has 5 pin din for your synths, and I'd imagine 1/2 or more the price)... If you were using a windows setup, I would stick with your rme plan, (and again, they are great, certainly not disparaging them at all), just saying that due to macOS and what you are trying to do, and on a budget, I can't imagine much difference in either quality or longevity.
     
  6. tzzsmk

    tzzsmk Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2016
    Messages:
    4,499
    Likes Received:
    2,830
    Location:
    Heart of Europe
    yes this is the step up in the right direction :yes:
    of course you'll need some nice mic preamp for the vocal mic - that Golden Age Pre-73 looks decent (kinda expensive for my taste), maybe I'd rather pick something like DBX 286 S for the features, but that's always something you can do in post

    PS: also if you'll go RME route, do consider ARC USB to control it (especially if you use headphones or monitors without additional volume/mute control), it costs extra, but it's way more comfortable than clicking in TotalMix
     
  7. clone

    clone Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2021
    Messages:
    10,284
    Likes Received:
    4,435
    I would consider just about any other option you can figure out than buying additional convertors or interface with more I/O to connect individual pedals. Patchbay, small analog line mixer or any other options like that. Additional physical I/O is always much more expensive. That can be subject to your planned workflow though, like using each pedal on a different channels simultaneously, tweaking them realtime vs stem printing them using the Logic I/O plugin, etc.

    Audio interfaces with additional i/o get pricey quite quickly.
     
Loading...
Loading...