just kidding, hey why not read the audiotools manuial and ingnore chatgpt? if done share it rulefree with pulsewave to feel how lucky and smart this feels!

 

Last edited: Jan 22, 2026 at 8:05 AM

yeah! it can really be useful for this sort of stuff. It can also be terrible, giving you information from version 6 of the software, when its on version 12, etc.

 

ChatGPT can solve many problems, only without emotions. LOL.

 

I do the same but with my blood test results

 

When you upload images those chats lag, and they will also limit how much you can actually ask it.
There's really no need to upload images at all.

You should send it a current plugin inventory and hardware inventory as text, and tell it to save it. Then it will tailor answers to what you are really using. If you tell it to switch to Candid or Professional mode, it will give a lot better, useful results. It gets rid of all the conversational sycophant garbage.

 

That sentence says a lot about the intellectual decay of some people. They claim, and I quote: "Looking it up in the manual would be tedious and time-consuming." Wow, what nonsense! It's pretty stupid to ask the AI instead of looking in the manual where the truth is. Thanks for your post; now I know for sure that some of my fellow humans aren't functioning properly anymore.

By the way, if you're going to post something about the AI, it belongs in a spoiler tag; it's also in the Audioz rules.

 

The slow decline of the human mind,

 

It takes some serious skill to make a trillion dollars worth of investments into technology give incorrect answers for everything you ask it.

 

You can load the manuals into NotebookLM and it will only reference them. It's essentially an AI for your own source material and it works very well.

https://notebooklm.google.com/

 

When you're in the "not reading what OP said" competition and your opponent is this chat:

 

op edited their initial text

 

I see that, but I didn't think it could be a 180° turn. What was there originally then?

 

What does this have to do with me? Is @tracer trying to get revenge or is he just desperate to drag me into this? What are people supposed to share with me? Projecting your own failures onto others to make yourself look good isn't exactly a nice thing to do.

 

They should've let it evolve slowly, like it was last year, but profits can't wait. "Just imagine, people will share their most intimate thoughts with us and be happy about it. We have the ultimate spyware and control device on our hands! :P And the data brokers are also like: "

I am not against AI, but this kind of tech shouldn't be rushed. We should test it, tons of testing, see how it goes first, and certainly not invest trillions into data centres and deprive PC users of their RAM and SSDs. Rather let people play with LLMs so we could learn even more about it.

 

Last edited: Jan 22, 2026 at 12:23 PM