The behavior of said company in the business of 2025, still living off the glorious rents of the past...

https://www.tiktok.com/@dilanmoreno459/video/7008710071089777925?lang=es


By the way, I'd like to take this opportunity to ask (any expert who might happen to stumble across this corner of the internet): Which version of Cubase is best suited for OSX Sequoia?

Thanks in advance.

 

What do you mean? check google trends. Cubase number same as PT

 

Cubase 14 (Pro/Artist/Elements) is the best-suited version for macOS Sequoia.

It's fully native for Apple Silicon (M-series chips like M1/M2/M3/M4), with optimized performance and no major compatibility caveats reported in recent user feedback or guides.

 

People have to wake up and stop believing what they are told on Social Media, especially TikTok of all places.

 

Steinberg lost their value a while back when they decided to go for bedroom producers. Their price and upgrade policies are beyond sh*t!

 

If you did a little more research on Steinberg, instead of believing everything someone writes on the internet, you wouldn't write something like that. Cubase has always been groundbreaking; anything Cubase introduces, other DAWs adopt two to three months later. You pay the full price for the Pro version of Cubase once, and then you get every major update for €99/$99. That's reasonable for what you get. Their other products are also reasonably priced (and high-quality); Native Instruments, for example, charges considerably more.

 

cubase is cumbersome to use and looks awful. at least pro-tools has a logical flow to it. but steinberg also makes dorico, which i love.