Assuming you ignore the fact that making the sample pack available on audioz is most likely a copyright infringement and knowing that you are downloading an illegally provided sample pack, then basically, yes.

 

I would rather just sell the NFT of a song created by AI trained on copyright protected sources.

 

/Edit sorry wrong thread

 

Last edited: Oct 23, 2024

You are in the wrong thread!

 

they will sue themselves and the general public gets the bill.

that´s what they do in many other fields with success already, at least in countries with legal aid for both, private persons and corporations, this is a large business area.

 

it is even worse.

such a company could just buy all titles from flea markets or itunes and then they use a legit copy - to do something with it which is currently simply not regulated, so it naturally ends up before courts.

 

Regarding "trained" AI ...

I wonder what about all the musicians ... all trained on Bach, Beatles, Stockhausen, Swift ... all their work in the coming hundreds of years will be subject to copyright infringement suits. Let alone all the autodidacts that have learned from listening to records, radio and live shows. Every musician will be sued by every other musician that was before him.

And for the writers ... every writer has learned from all the writers before him, yep, has learned from everybody who has used language in his presence. Has learned from TV, newspaper, every conversation ever happened.

And the painters ...

And the architects ...

And the ...

See, where all that is going? It's just simply stupid. Recommended: let AI do the heavy lifting, lie about using it, done. You lie about where you get your ideas from, why stop lying now and pretend t4o be a honest broker of the pure arts?

Laughable. Every artists is a con artist. An illusionist. A cheat. A pretender. A magician. So f it and lie.

 

Last edited: Oct 23, 2024