Best low cpu EQ plugin with non-visual controls?

Discussion in 'Mixing and Mastering' started by Grater, Nov 29, 2022.

  1. Boreios

    Boreios Kapellmeister

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2022
    Messages:
    58
    Likes Received:
    42
    -
     
    Last edited: Jun 4, 2024
    • Like Like x 4
    • Interesting Interesting x 1
    • List
  2. Frantiac

    Frantiac Member

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2019
    Messages:
    24
    Likes Received:
    15
  3. Riddim Machine

    Riddim Machine Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2021
    Messages:
    632
    Likes Received:
    547
    Location:
    Jamaica
    ReaEQ all the way up. If you like analog curves and low cpu (and don't want EVER get phase problems again) go for EQuilibrium. These are the only 2 digital eqs im using right now (except for the dynamic ones). I feel i don't need anything extra from nothing else, except analog emulations in especific situations for tone. Believe me, i also don't like graphs like Kirchhoff or Pro-Q, those are my lifesavers.
     
    Last edited: Nov 30, 2022
  4. Myfanwy

    Myfanwy Platinum Record

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2020
    Messages:
    401
    Likes Received:
    182
    My simple advice: learn the basics of digital signal processing, iir vs. fir filters, oversampled vs. not oversampled filters at different sampling rates, so called "decramping" algorithms in modern zero latency EQs and the resulting differences in filter curves and different interpretations of Q values for filters before attempting to judge any EQ plugin with subjective comments (you might have read in thousands of posts of "professionals") like "sounding phasey" or "kills transient energy and phase relationship" or accusing anyone to have insufficient monitoring.
     
    • Agree Agree x 6
    • Winner Winner x 2
    • List
  5. Riddim Machine

    Riddim Machine Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2021
    Messages:
    632
    Likes Received:
    547
    Location:
    Jamaica

    I didnt like it. I'm a huge fan of channel strips (amek 9099 and ssl 9k from BX are the ones im going for now) but with VCS i feel my mix got thinner. the 3 types of preamp are a good tool for creative saturation but i don't get the glue through the THD of this one as i get with other CS (even from waves or analog obsession). Fuse audio is great for other tools, but this one im skipping after some tests
     
  6. runa_forceful

    runa_forceful Ultrasonic

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2022
    Messages:
    50
    Likes Received:
    20
    Agree!
     
  7. runa_forceful

    runa_forceful Ultrasonic

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2022
    Messages:
    50
    Likes Received:
    20
    I think transparent just by word,,
    I trust my ears with fully concentration he kill transient energy, especially on lowend if using hp filter.. or etc. The fun fact sound better on eq8 abletn live..
     
    • Disagree Disagree x 4
    • Funny Funny x 3
    • List
  8. runa_forceful

    runa_forceful Ultrasonic

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2022
    Messages:
    50
    Likes Received:
    20

    You have try the overtone dsp!!!
     
  9. runa_forceful

    runa_forceful Ultrasonic

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2022
    Messages:
    50
    Likes Received:
    20
    Just hear it... sounds good or bad..
    Anyway i have research about that, try n errors but the sound still bad :rofl:
     
  10. runa_forceful

    runa_forceful Ultrasonic

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2022
    Messages:
    50
    Likes Received:
    20
    I have new friend :winker:
     
  11. Grater

    Grater Ultrasonic

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2019
    Messages:
    143
    Likes Received:
    26
    lol just use your ears bro. If you can't hear the difference between EQs that's definitely on you.
     
  12. executioner

    executioner Guest

    :facepalm:

    I have the 9099 but is there any incentive to get the 9k? I've been using the Amek and I think it's great (especially the interface, which was my gripe with the VCS) but wanted to know what you're thoughts on their differences were, workflow and whatnot. I had waves SSL for a long time but I phased out my waves stuff recently which got me thinking about whether I really need all these channel strips
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • List
  13. ZUK

    ZUK Rock Star

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2011
    Messages:
    565
    Likes Received:
    351
    Tiny-Q - Christian Budde
    [​IMG]
     
  14. Riddim Machine

    Riddim Machine Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2021
    Messages:
    632
    Likes Received:
    547
    Location:
    Jamaica
    Totally different sounds. As a channel strip i can't think of a better one than the 9099. That thing is a monster, it has everthing and more you will ever need in a CS. But the 9K has a sound that is more "Radio friendly", the sound itself is more bright and somehow HiFi and hyped (the 9099 is also HiFi, but more bass heavy and silky in the highs; RND), the eq boosts and cuts are very musical in the 9K and the compressor and gate are classic SSL. If you like the workflow on the waves SSL you will love the 9K. My ears got tired of the gritty 4K sound of most of analog strips :rofl:too rock and roll for me. the 9K is more in the R&B Pop realm
     
  15. executioner

    executioner Guest

    Cool, guess I'll pick up the 9K right now haha. I usually have the strips last in my processing and like you said, the body and sheen amek gives it some really nice flavor to my sounds at the end. I do all the heavy lifting on my Pro-Q3 for my eq needs because I'm very heavy into sound design and adjust it further on the CS if needed. I did like the waves SSL before I got rid of it so I guess I shouldn't be disappointed with the buy. Thanks again!
     
  16. tzzsmk

    tzzsmk Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2016
    Messages:
    3,650
    Likes Received:
    2,245
    Location:
    Heart of Europe
    Reaper has a button to toggle generic UI on any plugin, there's nothing uglier I can think of...
    if you want something nice and functional, but without visuals, free TDR VOS SlickEQ is definitely my pick, and if you have few bucks to spend then GE (Gentleman Edition) of that plugin, and TDR SlickEQ Mastering edition (it does have frequency graph you can hide/disable)
    :chilling:
    40% sale ends today, I wouldn't hesitate a second, and buy whole TDR bundle (without OD) for 120 bucks
     
  17. Hazen

    Hazen Rock Star

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2016
    Messages:
    704
    Likes Received:
    410
    Never heard of this issue, even though I'm using Ableton intensively for the past 3 years (previously I used Cubase for decades). Fair enough: I often instinctively reach for Kilohearts Slice EQ (a visual EQ), but not primarily because of sound issues with EQ 8, but because my myopic eyes prefer the resizable GUI of Khs Slice, that can be enlarged over the full size of my screen.

    Have you guys tried whether EQ 8 in oversampling mode has the same phase issues you witnessed when using low cuts?
     
  18. score

    score Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2012
    Messages:
    23
    Likes Received:
    11
    Location:
    Hamburg, Germany
    in the description he says : If you don’t have McDSP’s FilterBank plug-in, you can use the Logic Pro X Channel EQ’s high- and low-pass filters with excellent results as well.

    so what should i hear ?

    the difference in sound is the difference in q interpretation
     
    Last edited: Nov 30, 2022
  19. Grater

    Grater Ultrasonic

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2019
    Messages:
    143
    Likes Received:
    26
    You dont hear a massive difference in sound?
     
  20. Grater

    Grater Ultrasonic

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2019
    Messages:
    143
    Likes Received:
    26
    Did u compare it to the ssl native channelstrip 2? One is the k and the pa one is the j. Curious what u think about them. I‘m really playing with the idea of getting the amek channelstrip tho…
     
Loading...
Loading...