stl stuffs are too fizzy for me.

 

@keyone1a
You see - PT,Nuendo,Sequoia, Pyramix - its different league. most of 95% of Warez users doesn't need it actyally. But they stay in R2R's "blacklist".
And, you mentioned Revoice, yes, but no VocalIghn, I'm pretty sure they share same protection.
AudioUTOPiA vs R2R - is there any proof that is not same people ? :D

 

'Our greetings go to all hard working groups,
and middle fingers to the people who makes money with our effort.

Support the good developer if you use it.
We would like to support you for free,
as long as you understand what you are doing and what it means.'

I just wonder what made them to take that phrase out of their nfos starting release 9.997? I mean that was kind of their signature from the first day on as team R2R. Just realized it today because their new nfos looked so 'empty'

 

@glassybrick

i guess they knew that a new vocalign version was coming soon and didn't bother to crack the old version. Vocalign ultra came after the big wave. Moreover, revoice is more sophisticated than vocalign. So just wait and see. They owe no one anything

 

They are consistently in the best of their field.

Personally I'd love to see them do the newer East/West engine and libs and the newer Best service engine + libs, but nobody has dared touch them so far. The fact they do most things is enough.

 

Nope, they have released TEAM R2R Root Certificate-R2R and said "From 10,000 release, we decided to sign our tools (emulator, system DLL, other utility) with our own signature." which with 99,9% certainty means they will stay and I consider the matter of them leaving finished. They wouldn't bother to do this if they have planned to leave I think.

 

So happy about the TAL updates

 

Why mention them then?

 

Are you thinking they don’t release because people don’t want them? I was about to disagree with you because most of the time they crack “because it’s there” and because of the challenge don’t they, but as you say, they may crack and keep internal. Or maybe it’s because they can’t get the legit licenses to be able to reverse?? I always wonder if the likes of ilok stuff for example, is it that once they learn how to strip from one program they all fall??

 

No, this is not entirely true, if they crack one i-lock plugin,
We cannot get all third-party i-lok plugins. Since they also have other protection besides the main one.

also we will not get rare animals, with a small development team, as R2R themselves said.

 

I know you are talking about R2R, but the expression "blacklist" in regards the sister site at least is because there is a list of companies that have a lot of clout, and will even DMCA on requests.
The sister site does not have the 'protection' that the tracker has!
This may also affect what they choose to crack, I don't know.

 

Why releasing great stuff under another name if they are the same people ?

 

In the scene, it is true that some people will join several groups at the same time, but this does not mean that they are same group.
Some groups are even the suppliers of other groups....
E.g.
R2R gave resources to RET, the trick about Metafortress, permissions of including keygen..
R2R gave Flare installer scripts..

 

I'm basically saying while I'd like them, I'm happy because they have already given us everything except for those. It's easier to says what's left than to say what's already released

 

I haven't read what you are referring to, but just to say we aren't allowed to request here.
Any comment that is seen as a request will get you a warning.

 

I wasn't requesting, although I guess you could take it that way. I said there were just a few things I'd like but I'm happy as is. It's easier to list the the plugins they haven't given us than to list what they have. I meant "while I'd like these few things, they have already given us EVERYTHING else so I'm already happy" which was in response to someone else saying they hoped a certain plugin would get released. People misunderstand what I mean all the time, I lack the ability to properly convey a thought

 

I wasn't necessarily suggesting that, and I said I haven't read what you were referring to.
And it's not up to me what is considered a request, but our moderators.
Just mentioning what is mentioned in the site rules which we are asked to read the second we join.
Wouldn't want to see any newb get warning points!

 

If I've already broke the rules then I'll delete my account. I only made one to thank the teams and folks who run the site and I've already done that. Not here to stir up drama and break the rules

 

Not applicable. Chill.
Please, I'm just saying.
I'm sure it may be alright, but I had to just say.

 

I know. Thank you