My issue is with the patcher's Cpu usage. When I load a bunch of patchers inside another patcher and enable the "smart disable" for the root patcher, unfortunately doesn't reduce the CPU usage. I also enable the "smart disable" in the Audio page but nothing changes. "Smart disable" does not work for the inside patchers. Like this:



It would be so appreciated if someone reports it to image-line.

 

You have an internet connection, you can type, where's the problem???

 

technical support forum?

 

Because I'm not a legitimate user. Only the legit can create threads, post and keep them informed of the bugs and such issues. Also I don't think they would welcome illegal users via email.

 

I would, but I'm a vst only customer, so they seem to hold me about the same esteem as you

 

You mean they have no email adress?? Do you know how many companies I adressed with problems I found in try-before-buy versions? A lot.

 

Is there a chance that this could be a bug that happens only in non-legit versions? To be sure you'd have to try to reproduce the problem on the same version in a legit copy on the same system.

 

Thanks mate, I haven't gone through that method. It was better to do it beforehand.

But as you know new bugs appear in new releases that existed or didn't exist in the previous versions. What about dedicating this thread for the conveyance of such problems to Image-line for everyone who doesn't have direct access to Image-line's forum?

Everyone would benefit from this thread.

 

I can't tell but patcher has had lots of issues from the word go and as likely as not, mine wouldn't be the last one.

For example a case in point:
Patcher within patcher bug

 

Dedicating this thread to such problems would be a great idea for sure, but then the title won't fit anymore (and yes, I'm aware that this wasn't exactly your proposal).

 

My kind, what do you suggest for the title? I will change it.

 

For instance, 'Fruity Loops [insert version] issue, bug or solvable?' or something like that. That's not too much of a problem for you, isn't it?

 

Thanks so much!
I can rename it but don't you think in this fashion, there will be one thread for each version that makes the management more bothersome? On the other hand a single thread would also complicate the situation.

Please take a look at:
https://forum.image-line.com/viewforum.php?f=1990
They announce the new version on TOP and delete or replace the previous one and every member notifies the staff of the problems in separate threads but it gets messy after a while.

A compromise between a single thread or multiple threads. Are you still in favor of multiple threads? Which one?

 

writing an accurate title without a bogus premise would defeat the whole purpose with his "threads"..

 

Last edited: Feb 16, 2019

Don't try to turn members against me. Please first read the comments carefully.

 

Last edited: Feb 16, 2019

Just change the title, don't make yourself a target for trollers.

It will be endless when it comes to non-legitimate user demand.

Listen to other people for a chance is good.

And buying a legit copy of Fruity Loops will do justice to both of you and Image-Line.

Image-Line is a great company, and many will agree with me.

 

I'm not very familiar with the FL versions, but one thread for every major release (19xx, 20.xx) maybe?

 

I know what you're talking about, but nagging at him isn't really helpful.

 

Really unlikely. IIRC Image Line has been so easily, thoroughly keygenned by R2R you don't even have to patch the software. So cracked version and legit version are basically no different.

 

I was not a legit user for years and was a member of the forum. I never had an issue nor they with me.