Zoom F4 vs Tascam DR-680 MkII ? (SOLVED)

Discussion in 'Soundgear' started by phloopy, Jan 2, 2018.

  1. phloopy

    phloopy Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2011
    Messages:
    3,937
    Likes Received:
    1,851
    Hi

    Any of you guys know about these two field recorders?

    I need four inputs and I cannot find out which of these two units are the best buy on a budget!!!

    Thanks in advance.
     
    Last edited: Jan 2, 2018
  2.  
  3. Andrew

    Andrew AudioSEX Maestro

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2011
    Messages:
    1,999
    Likes Received:
    1,230
    Location:
    Between worlds
    Hi,
    I wouldn't trust Zoom any longer to produce quality product. There are always some kind of issues.
    Zoom H4 - timing errors, gain switches accumulate dust
    Zoom H4n - severe harmonic distortion (above 2%)
    Zoom H2 - short battery life, polar pattern switch goes bad in 1 year of use
    Zoom H2n - high noise floor
    Zoom H1 - poor RF shielding, captures CPU noise
    Zoom H5 - severe distortion (above 20%) in DAC mode for frequencies above 8kHz
    Zoom H6 - suboptimal gain staging in ADC
     
    • Like Like x 3
    • Interesting Interesting x 2
    • List
  4. phloopy

    phloopy Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2011
    Messages:
    3,937
    Likes Received:
    1,851
    Hi Andrew :wink:

    Thanks for feedback ..... those are indeed serious issues and you have nearly all ZOOM units lined up :dunno::no:

    Im already a Tascam freak, but I like the input knobs on the F4 and some places they give that unit good reviews!

    Thanks for feedback - appriciated :mates:
     
  5. kimikaze

    kimikaze Platinum Record

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2014
    Messages:
    346
    Likes Received:
    158
    Don't own any of them and talking purely from SQ perspective, but from what i could hear through youtube samples and other recordings between these two brand, i definitely prefer tascam. Sound more natural and neutral in frequency.
     
  6. digitaldragon

    digitaldragon Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2016
    Messages:
    1,259
    Likes Received:
    1,067
    Not a 4 input unit, but I have a Tascam DR-40 I use for song writing on the acoustic. I record the guitar part, and can then come back and lay the vocals on two more tracks. Works great, and sound quality of the recording is top notch. When I record our band practices, it's unbelievable what this thing sounds like.
    Only thing I've noticed is everyone must set their phones to airplane mode as it will pick up GSM noise from cell phones in it's proximity.
     
  7. phloopy

    phloopy Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2011
    Messages:
    3,937
    Likes Received:
    1,851
    Thanks for feedback kimikaze :wink:

    Yes, I´ve listen myself but it´s hard to get an exact reference as long as they are compressed sounds from YT!

    I guess it ends up with the Tascam .....!
     
  8. phloopy

    phloopy Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2011
    Messages:
    3,937
    Likes Received:
    1,851
    Thanks DD :wink:

    Yes, I already have the Tascam DR-100 now and Im very pleased with it but need those four inputs!!
     
  9. digitaldragon

    digitaldragon Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2016
    Messages:
    1,259
    Likes Received:
    1,067
    DR-100 looks like an interesting piece as well. I actually was looking at it before deciding on the DR-40.
    I decided against any Zoom products after owning one of their guitar pedal boards.
    Are you looking to record the 4 tracks to their own individual channels? If so, the DR-680 looks like a nice field recorder for that.
     
  10. fiction

    fiction Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    1,924
    Likes Received:
    703
    Seems like I'm the only lucky owner of (different) Zoom products:
    H1, H6, UAC-8 USB Audio/Midi, MS-100BT FX pedal.
    I'm very satisfied with all of them. The "suboptimal gain staging" in the H6 is true but wouldn't stop me from purchasing again, yet I have to say that the menu system could be better on the H6. Dr-680 and F4 look sexy but are too big for my taste ... but that's off topic.
     
  11. Andrew

    Andrew AudioSEX Maestro

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2011
    Messages:
    1,999
    Likes Received:
    1,230
    Location:
    Between worlds
    I contemplated DR-100 as well, but no DAC put me down. Eventually I settled with Zoom H2n. It's still Zoom, but it has the least problems out of all of them.
     
  12. phloopy

    phloopy Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2011
    Messages:
    3,937
    Likes Received:
    1,851
    :wink::wink:
     
  13. phloopy

    phloopy Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2011
    Messages:
    3,937
    Likes Received:
    1,851
    Hi fiction
    Thanks for your feedback - appriciated :wink:

    I have no experiences with any Zoom units at all, but I´ve owned the Tascam DR-100 for some time now and it works great and Im satisfied with the sound quality etc. Im a bit conservative when it comes to matters like this, so I´ll guess I´ll end up with the DR-680 but on the other hand: No one has exactly told me anything about the Zoom F4 yet so Im open minded :yes:
     
  14. phloopy

    phloopy Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2011
    Messages:
    3,937
    Likes Received:
    1,851
    I know this is the old version of DR-680 .... amps might be improved in MK2.... but does this review really make any sense?

     
  15. kimikaze

    kimikaze Platinum Record

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2014
    Messages:
    346
    Likes Received:
    158
    I did listen now a few examples of f4 through youtube and must say(for what is experience through youtube worth) for vocals i prefer f4 over dr-680, but then i prefer MixPre-3 over both :)
     
  16. phloopy

    phloopy Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2011
    Messages:
    3,937
    Likes Received:
    1,851
    Sound Devices isn´t really for my budget :rofl:
     
  17. kimikaze

    kimikaze Platinum Record

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2014
    Messages:
    346
    Likes Received:
    158
    Yeah definitely premium price. I think most sensible approach would be to choose on basis on your needs(functions you will use most) and workflow. Go through setup and recording procedure(manuals, reviews, video reviews) and choose which one suit you more. Meantime you could also find some potential downfalss or software bugs of each.
     
  18. phloopy

    phloopy Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2011
    Messages:
    3,937
    Likes Received:
    1,851
    Actually found a second hand (Practically new and still under warranty) 890 US, but....

    Only three inputs :sad::no:
     
  19. kimikaze

    kimikaze Platinum Record

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2014
    Messages:
    346
    Likes Received:
    158
    Don't know from where you are, but for this money in some parts of the world, you can get Pre-6, which have 4 inputs. Pre-3 should be around 650 US, which of course for 3 channel is still a premium. So this brand is obviously not a budget brand nor it offer substantial better SQ. So by all means stay with good and budget friendly options like tascam, zoom or some others if you can't easily afford more than 500$.
     
  20. phloopy

    phloopy Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2011
    Messages:
    3,937
    Likes Received:
    1,851
    Could you please point me out where to get the Pre-3 for 650 US?

    Price (new) here is about two times that price!
     
  21. phloopy

    phloopy Audiosexual

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2011
    Messages:
    3,937
    Likes Received:
    1,851
    Forget it!

    You must live in the US :)
     
Loading...
Loading...